About 'international standard of accounting'|Beta Alpha Psi to host conference to address proposed adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards

About 'international standard of accounting'|Beta Alpha Psi to host conference to address proposed adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards

Ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ               ｍｅａｓｕｒｅ               ｈｏｗ               ｍａｎｙ               ｔｈｒｅａｄｓ               ｌｅｎｇｔｈｗｉｓｅ               ａｎｄ               ｗｉｄｔｈｗｉｓｅ               ａｒｅ               ｗｏｖｅｎ,               ｏｎ               ｏｎｅ               ｓｑｕａｒｅ               ｉｎｃｈ               ｏｆ               ｆａｂｒｉｃ. Ａｓ               ｗｅｌｌ,               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ               ｉｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｎｕｍｂｅｒ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｒｅａｄｓ               ｇｏｉｎｇ               ｅａｃｈ               ｗａｙ,               ｉｎ               ｏｎｅ               ｓｑｕａｒｅ               ｉｎｃｈ               ｏｆ               ｆａｂｒｉｃ. Ｔｈｒｅａｄ               Ｃｏｕｎｔ               ｒａｎｇｅｓ               80               ｔｏ               1,200. Ｉｍｐｒｏｖｅｍｅｎｔｓ               ｉｎ               ｓｐｉｎｎｉｎｇ               ａｎｄ               ｍｉｌｌｉｎｇ               ｔｅｃｈｎｏｌｏｇｉｅｓ               ｈａｖｅ               ｉｎｃｒｅａｓｅｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｎｕｍｂｅｒ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔｓ,               ｐｅｒ               ｓｑｕａｒｅ               ｉｎｃｈ. Ｈｉｇｈ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ               ａｃｃｏｕｎｔｓ               ｆｏｒ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｄｅｎｓｅｌｙ               ｗｏｖｅｎ               ｆａｂｒｉｃ               ｔｈａｔ               ｌａｓｔｓ               ｌｏｎｇｅｒ,               ａｎｄ               ｆｅｅｌｓ               ｓｏｆｔｅｒ. Ｈｏｗｅｖｅｒ,               ｌｉｎｅｎ,               ｆｌａｎｎｅｌ,               ａｎｄ               ｊｅｒｓｅｙ               ｈａｖｅ               ａ               ｌｏｗ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ               Ｆｉｎｅｒ               ｔｈｒｅａｄｓ,               ｓｕｃｈ               ａｓ               Ｅｇｙｐｔｉａｎ               ｏｒ               Ｐｉｍａ,               ａｎｄ               ＵＳＡ               ｍａｄｅ               ｃｏｔｔｏｎ               ａｒｅ               ｅｑｕａｌｌｙ               ｃｏｍｐａｒａｂｌｅ,               ａｎｄ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｏｆ               ｅａｃｈ               ｏｎｅ,               ｃａｎ               ｂｅ               ｗｏｖｅｎ               ｉｎｔｏ               ａ               ｓｑｕａｒｅ               ｉｎｃｈ,               ｐｒｏｄｕｃｉｎｇ               ａ               ｆｉｎｅｒ               ｆａｂｒｉｃ,               ｗｈｉｃｈ               ｆｅｅｌｓ               ｓｏｆｔｅｒ               ａｎｄ               ｓｍｏｏｔｈ. Ｔｈｉｓ               ｍｅａｎｓ               350               ｔｈｒｅａｄｓ               ｓｈｅｅｔ               ｃｏｕｎｔ,               ａｃｔｕａｌｌｙ               ｆｅｅｌｓ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｃｏｍｆｏｒｔａｂｌｅ               ｔｈａｎ               600               ｔｈｒｅａｄｓ               ｃｏｕｎｔ,               ｄｅｐｅｎｄｉｎｇ               ｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｑｕａｌｉｔｙ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｏｔｔｏｎ. Ｓｏｍｅ               ｍａｎｕｆａｃｔｕｒｅｓ               ｗｉｌｌ               ｔｗｉｓｔ               ｔｗｏ               ｔｈｉｎｎｅｒ               ｔｈｒｅａｄｓ               ｔｏｇｅｔｈｅｒ,               ｃｒｅａｔｉｎｇ               ａ               ｄｏｕｂｌｅ-ｐｌｙ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ,               ａｎｄ               ａｄｖｅｒｔｉｓｅ               ｔｗｉｃｅ               ｔｈｅ               ａｃｔｕａｌ               ｎｕｍｂｅｒ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｒｅａｄｓ. Ａ               ｈｉｇｈ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ               ｓｈｅｅｔｓ               ｗｉｌｌ               ｉｎｃｒｅａｓｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｏｆｔｎｅｓｓ               ａｎｄ               ｌｕｓｔｅｒ,               ａｆｔｅｒ               ａ               ｎｕｍｂｅｒ               ｏｆ               ｗａｓｈｉｎｇｓ. Ａ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ               ｏｖｅｒ               180               ｉｓ               ｃａｌｌｅｄ               ｐｅｒｃａｌｅ. Ｇｏｏｄ               ｑｕａｌｉｔｙ               ｓｈｅｅｔｓ               ｈａｖｅ               200               ｏｒ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ. Ａ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ               ａｂｏｖｅ               400               ｉｓ               ｅｘｐｅｎｓｉｖｅ               ｔｏ               ｐｕｒｃｈａｓｅ. Ｍｏｓｔ               ｌｉｎｅｎ               ｏｒ               ｒｅｔａｉｌ               ｓｔｏｒｅｓ               ｓｅｌｌ               ｓｈｅｅｔｓ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔｓ               ｒａｎｇｉｎｇ               ｆｒｏｍ               180               -               500. Ａｌｓｏ,               ｔｈｅ               ｓｉｚｅ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｙａｒｎ               ｄｏｅｓ               ａｆｆｅｃｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ. Ｔｈｅ               ｈｉｇｈｅｒ               ｙａｒｎ               ｓｉｚｅ,               ｔｈｅ               ｂｅｔｔｅｒ               ｑｕａｌｉｔｙ               ｍａｎｕｆａｃｔｕｒｅｄ. Ｗｈｅｎ               ａ               ｌｏｗｅｒ               ｑｕａｌｉｔｙ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｉｓ               ｔａｉｌｏｒｅｄ,               ｓｈｅｅｔｓ               ｆｅｅｌ               ｓｔｉｆｆｅｒ. Ｇｏｏｄ               ｑｕａｌｉｔｙ               ｂｅｄ               ｓｈｅｅｔｓ               ｈａｖｉｎｇ               ａ               ｓｏｆｔ               ａｎｄ               ｌｕｘｕｒｉｏｕｓ               ｆｅｅｌ,               ｈａｖｅ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ               180               -               420,               ｕｓｉｎｇ               ｏｎｅ               ｐｌｙ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ,               ｗｉｔｈ               ｙａｒｎ               ｓｉｚｅ               40               -               100               ｐｏｕｎｄ/ｙａｒｄ. Ｈｏｗｅｖｅｒ,               ｒａｒｅｌｙ               ｙａｒｎ               ｓｉｚｅ               ｉｓ               ｐｒｉｎｔｅｄ               ｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｐａｃｋａｇｅ               ａｎｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｏｎｓｕｍｅｒ               ｈａｓ               ｎｏ               ｉｄｅａ               ｏｆ               ｉｄｅｎｔｉｆｙｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               ｑｕａｌｉｔｙ. Ｐａｃｉｆｉｃ               Ｃｏａｓｔ               ｐｒｏｄｕｃｔｓ               ｐｒｉｎｔ               ｏｎ               ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｌａｂｅｌ               ｐａｃｋａｇｅ,               ａｃｔｕａｌ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ. Ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｆａｂｒｉｃｓ               ｈａｖｅ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｉｎｄｅｐｅｎｄｅｎｔｌｙ               ｔｅｓｔｅｄ,               ｄｅｔｅｒｍｉｎｅｄ               102               ｐｅｒｃｅｎｔ               ａｂｏｖｅ               ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｐｒｉｎｔｅｄ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ,               ａｎｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｈｉｇｈｅｓｔ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｉｎｄｕｓｔｒｙ. Ｉｒｏｎｉｎｇ               ｓｈｅｅｔｓ               ｃｏｎｔａｉｎｉｎｇ               ｈｉｇｈ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔｓ,               ｉｍｐｒｏｖｅｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｍｏｏｔｈｎｅｓｓ. Ｓｈｅｅｔｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｈａｖｅ               ｃｏｔｔｏｎ               ａｎｄ               ｐｏｌｙｅｓｔｅｒ               ｂｌｅｎｄｓ,               ｄｏｎ'ｔ               ｎｅｃｅｓｓａｒｉｌｙ               ｎｅｅｄ               ｉｒｏｎｉｎｇ,               ｂｕｔ               ｄｏｎ'ｔ               ｂｒｅａｔｈｅ               ｗｅｌｌ               ａｎｄ               ｍａｙ               ｆｅｅｌ               ｕｎｃｏｍｆｏｒｔａｂｌｅ. Ｒｅｐｏｒｔｅｄ               ｉｎ               1999               Ｔｒａｄｅ               ｐｕｂｌｉｃａｔｉｏｎ               Ｈｏｍｅ               Ｆｕｒｎｉｓｈｉｎｇｓ               Ｎｅｗｓ,               Ａｍｅｒｉｃａｎｓ               ｓｐｅｎｄ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｔｈａｎ               $2               ｂｉｌｌｉｏｎ               ｉｎ               ａ               ｙｅａｒ               ｏｎ               ｓｈｅｅｔｓ. Ｃｏｎｔｒｉｂｕｔｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｆｏｒｔｙ-Ｆｏｕｒ               ｐｅｒｃｅｎｔ               180               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔｓ,               ａｎｄ               ｔｈｉｒｔｙ-ｅｉｇｈｔ               ｐｅｒｃｅｎｔ               ｆｏｒ               200               -               500               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ.                Ａｃｃｏｒｄｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               Ｃｏｎｓｕｍｅｒ               Ｒｅｐｏｒｔ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅ               "Ｄｏｎ'ｔ               ｇｅｔ               ｓｈｏｒｔ-ｓｈｅｅｔｅｄ               ｂｙ               ｉｎｆｌａｔｅｄ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ,"               Ｊｕｌｙ               31,               2005,               ｂｙ               ｔｈｅ               Ｅｄｉｔｏｒｓ               ｏｆ               Ｃｏｎｓｕｍｅｒ               Ｒｅｐｏｒｔｓ:               Ｒｅｃｏｍｍｅｎｄｓ               Ｔａｒｇｅｔ'ｓ               Ｐｒｅｍｉｅｒ               300               Ｅｇｙｐｔｉａｎ               ｃｏｔｔｏｎ               ｓａｔｅｅｎ               ｉｓ               ｇｏｏｄ               ｖａｌｕｅ               ａｎｄ               ｃｏｎｔａｉｎｓ               300               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ,               ａｖａｉｌａｂｌｅ               ｉｎ               ｏｆｆ-ｗｈｉｔｅ               ｓｈａｄｅｓ               ａｎｄ               ｌｉｇｈｔ               ｇｒｅｅｎ. Ａｌｓｏ,               Ｓｅａｌｙ               Ｂｅｓｔ               Ｆｉｔ               ｈａｖｉｎｇ               300               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ,               ａｎｄ               ａｖａｉｌａｂｌｅ               ｏｖｅｒｓｉｚｅｄ,               ｗｈｉｃｈ               ｃｏｍｐｅｎｓａｔｅｓ               ｆｏｒ               ｓｈｒｉｎｋａｇｅ,               ａｎｄ               ａｖａｉｌａｂｌｅ               ｉｎ               ｓｅｖｅｎ               ｃｏｌｏｒｓ. Ｐａｃｋａｇｅｄ               ｓｈｅｅｔｓ               ｓｈｏｕｌｄ               ｈａｖｅ               ｅｌａｓｔｉｃ               ｗｒａｐｐｉｎｇ               ａｒｏｕｎｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｅｄｇｅｓ. Ｒｅｍｅｍｂｅｒ               ｔｏ               ｋｅｅｐ               ｒｅｃｅｉｐｔｓ,               ｗｈｉｃｈ               ｉｓ               ｒｅｑｕｉｒｅｄ,               ｗｈｅｎ               ｒｅｔｕｒｎｉｎｇ               ｔｈｏｓｅ               ｓｈｅｅｔｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｆａｄｅ               ａｆｔｅｒ               ｌａｕｎｄｅｒｉｎｇ               ｏｒ               ｈａｖｅ               ｏｔｈｅｒ               ｑｕａｌｉｔｙ               ｍａｎｕｆａｃｔｕｒｅ               ｄｅｆｅｃｔｓ.                Ａｎ               ｉｎｔｅｒｎａｔｉｏｎａｌ               ｓｔａｎｄａｒｄ               ｇｒｏｕｐ,               ａｐｐｌｉｅｓ               ａ               Ｓｔａｎｄａｒｄ               Ｔｅｓｔ               Ｍｅｔｈｏｄ               ｆｏｒ               Ｗｒａｐ               Ｅｎｄ               Ｃｏｕｎｔ               ａｎｄ               Ｆｉｌｉｎｇ               Ｃｏｕｎｔ               ｏｆ               Ｗｏｖｅｎ               Ｆａｂｒｉｃ               (ＡＳＴＭ),               ｄｅｔｅｒｍｉｎｅｓ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔｓ. Ｔｈｅ               ＡＳＴＭ               ｍｅｔｈｏｄ               ｉｎｓｔｒｕｃｔｓ:               "Ｃｏｕｎｔ               ｉｎｄｉｖｉｄｕａｌ               ｗｒａｐ               ｙａｒｎｓ               (ｅｎｄｓ),               ａｎｄ               ｆｉｌｌｉｎｇ               ｙａｒｎｓ               (ｐｉｃｋｓ)               ａｓ               ｓｉｎｇｌｅ               ｕｎｉｔｓ               ｒｅｇａｒｄｌｅｓｓ               ｏｆ               ｗｈｅｔｈｅｒ               ｔｈｅｙ               ａｒｅ               ｃｏｍｐｒｉｓｅｄ               ｏｆ               ｓｉｎｇｌｅ               ｏｒ               ｐｉｌｅｄ               ｃｏｍｐｏｎｅｎｔｓ."               Ａｃｃｏｒｄｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               Ｍｒ. Ｗｒｉｇｈｔ,               ａ               ｃｏｎｓｕｌｔａｎｔ               ｗｉｔｈ               Ｄａｎ               Ｒｉｖｅｒ               Ｉｎｃｏｒｐｏｒａｔｅｄ               (ｔｅｘｔｉｌｅ               ｍａｋｅｒ),               ｉｎ               Ｄａｎｖｉｌｌｅ               Ｖｉｒｇｉｎｉａ,               ｒｅｆｅｒｒｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               ＡＳＴＭ               ｍｅｔｈｏｄ               ｓｔａｔｅｄ,               "Ｔｈａｔ'ｓ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｍｅｔｈｏｄ               ｆｏｒ               ｄｅｔｅｒｍｉｎｉｎｇ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ               ａｓ               ｌｏｎｇ               ａｓ               Ｉ'ｖｅ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｂｕｓｉｎｅｓｓ,               ｆｏｒ               50               ｙｅａｒｓ               ｎｏｗ."               Ｔｈｉｓ               ｃｏｎｃｅｒｎｓ               ｔｈｅ               Ｆｅｄｅｒａｌ               Ｔｒａｄｅ               Ｃｏｍｍｉｓｓｉｏｎ,               ｔｈａｔ               ｍａｎｕｆａｃｔｕｒｅｓ               ａｒｅ               ｃｏｕｎｔｉｎｇ               ｉｎｄｉｖｉｄｕａｌ               ｙａｒｎ               ｐｉｌｅｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｍａｋｅ               ｕｐ               ｅａｃｈ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ. Ｔｈｕｓ,               ｗｈｅｎ               ａ               ｃｏｎｓｕｍｅｒ               ｒｅａｄｓ               ａ               ｌａｂｅｌ               ｏｆ               ｓｈｅｅｔ               ｃｏｎｔａｉｎｉｎｇ               600               ｔｈｒｅａｄｓ               ｃｏｕｎｔｅｄ,               ｍａｙ               ａｃｔｕａｌｌｙ               ｈａｖｅ               300,               ｍａｄｅ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｔｗｏ-ｐｌｙ               ｙａｒｎ. Ｉｎ               Ａｕｇｕｓｔ               2005,               Ｔｈｅ               Ｆｅｄｅｒａｌ               Ｔｒａｄｅ               Ｃｏｍｍｉｓｓｉｏｎ'ｓ               Ｂｕｒｅａｕ               ｏｆ               Ｃｏｎｓｕｍｅｒ'ｓ               Ｐｒｏｔｅｃｔｉｏｎ               ａｄｖｉｓｅｄ               ｔｈａｔ               ｃｏｍｐａｎｉｅｓ               ｓｈｏｕｌｄ               ｌａｂｅｌ               ｐｒｏｄｕｃｔｓ               ｗｉｔｈ               ａｄｄｉｔｉｏｎａｌ               ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ               ｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｙａｒｎ'ｓ               ｐｌｙ. Ａｃｃｏｒｄｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               Ｐｒｏｆｅｓｓｏｒ               Ｐｅｔｅｒ               Ｓｃｈｗａｒｔｚ,               ｈｅａｄ               ｏｆ               Ｐｏｌｙｍｅｒ               Ａｎｄ               Ｆｉｂｅｒ               Ｅｎｇｉｎｅｅｒｉｎｇ               Ｄｅｐａｒｔｍｅｎｔ               ａｔ               Ａｕｂｕｒｎ               Ｕｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙ               ｉｎ               Ａｌａｂａｍａ,               ｎｏ               ｍｅｔｈｏｄ               ｔｏ               ｃｈｅｃｋ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｒｅｃｉｓｅ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ,               ｕｎｌｅｓｓ               ｙｏｕ               ｈａｖｅ               ａ               ｍｉｃｒｏｓｃｏｐｅ               ａｎｄ               ａｒｅ               "ｓｕｆｆｉｃｉｅｎｔｌｙ               ｐａｔｉｅｎｔ."               Ｔｈｅ               Ｆｅｄｅｒａｌ               Ｔｒａｄｅ               Ｃｏｍｍｉｓｓｉｏｎ               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ｐｒｅｆｅｒ               ｃｏｍｐａｎｉｅｓ               ｔｏ               ｌｉｓｔ               ｙａｒｎ-ｐｌｙ               ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ,               ａｌｏｎｇ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔｓ. Ｉｎ               Ｎｏｖｅｍｂｅｒ               2002,               Ｋａｔｈｌｅｅｎ               Ｈｕｄｄｙ,               Ｇｏｏｄｈｏｕｓｅｋｅｅｐｉｎｇ               ｔｅｘｔｉｌｅ               ｄｉｒｅｃｔｏｒ,               ｐｒｏｖｉｄｅｄ               ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ               ｕｐｏｎ               ｔｅｓｔｉｎｇ               ｔｈｉｒｔｅｅｎ               ｂｒａｎｄｓ               ｏｆ               ｓｈｅｅｔｓ,               ｓｏｌｄ               ａｔ               ｎａｔｉｏｎａｌ               ｌｉｎｅｎ               ｃｈａｉｎｓ,               ｉｎｃｌｕｄｉｎｇ               Ｓｙｎｅｒｇｙ,               Ｄｉｖａｔｅｘ               Ｈｏｍｅ               Ｆａｓｈｉｏｎｓ,               ａｎｄ               Ｒａｉｎｂｏｗ               Ｌｉｎｅｎｓ               -               ｒｅｓｕｌｔｓ               ｈａｄ               ｎｏｔ               ｓｈｏｗｎ               ａｎｙｗｈｅｒｅ               ｎｅａｒ               ｔｈｅ               400,               600,               ｏｒ               800               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ               ａｄｖｅｒｔｉｓｅｄ. Ｏｎｅ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅｓｅ               ｔｅｓｔｓ,               ｆｏｕｎｄ               ｔｈａｔ               ｏｎｅ               ｓｈｅｅｔ               ｌａｂｅｌｅｄ               ｈａｖｉｎｇ               1,500               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔｓ,               ａｃｔｕａｌｌｙ               ｈａｄ               ｏｎｌｙ               300               ｔｈｒｅａｄｓ               ｐｅｒ               ｓｑｕａｒｅ               ｉｎｃｈ. Ｋａｔｈｌｅｅｎ               Ｈｕｄｄｙ               ｓｕｇｇｅｓｔ               "Ｔｈｅ               ｔｉｐ-ｏｆｆ               ｉｓ               ａ               ｒｅａｌｌｙ               ｈｉｇｈ               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ               ｉｓ               ｒｅａｌｌｙ,               ｒｅａｌｌｙ               ｅｘｐｅｎｓｉｖｅ."               "Ｙｏｕ               ｄｏｎ'ｔ               ｇｅｔ               ａ               1,500               ｔｈｒｅａｄ               ｃｏｕｎｔ               ｓｈｅｅｔ               ｆｏｒ               $149.99               ａ               ｓｅｔ."

Image of international standard of accounting

international standard of accounting

international standard of accounting Image 1

international standard of accounting

international standard of accounting Image 2

international standard of accounting

international standard of accounting Image 3

international standard of accounting

international standard of accounting Image 4

international standard of accounting

international standard of accounting Image 5

Related blog with international standard of accounting

1. An Investigation of the Relationship Between Use of International Accounting Standards and Source of Company Finance in Germany

   spicaalmilia.wordpress.com/   06/28/2007

   ...Melissa Moy and Richard D. Morris This study examines the relationship between use of international accounting standards and companies’ source of finance. We Investigate the proposition contained...

2. Achieving International Harmonization of Accounting Standards (1975)

   accountinghistory.blogspot.com/   08/06/2012

   ...in the CICA Handbook . The exposure draft notes that the CICA is a member of the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) whose objectives are “to formulate and publish...

3. International Accounting Standards Boards Urges European ...European Fiscal Union And The Word, Will, And Way Of A European Chancellor And His European Banker

   theyenguy.wordpress.com/   08/30/2011

   ... internal models instead of market prices, the International Accounting Standards Board said in a letter published...

4. Domestic Accounting Standards, International Accounting Standards, and the Predictability of Earnings

   spicaalmilia.wordpress.com/   06/26/2007

   ... relative to International Accounting Standards (IAS) has an impact on the ability of financial analysts to...

5. APPLICATION OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS (IAS) IN BANGLADESH

   ivythesis.typepad.com/   06/29/2008

   ...Standards Board. The International Accounting Standards includes the presentations of financial statements...

6. Reforming the Governance of International Accounting Standard-Setting

   veron.typepad.com/   07/15/2008

   ...governance reform may sound arcane but it will probably have a large impact on the future shape of international accounting standard-setting. Download BruegelPolicyContribution_Jul08.pdf to read this piece.

7. Thesis Chapter 1 On Auditors’ Compliance With Ethical Requirement Of International Standards On Quality Control Element And Its Relationship With Audit Quality “Evidence From Malaysia”

   ivythesis.typepad.com/term_paper_topics/   12/06/2011

   ...Requirement of International Standards on Quality...the statement of accounts and other...The objective of the International Accounting Standard Board ...

8. Beta Alpha Psi to host conference to address proposed adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards

   hcobwmu.blogspot.com/   09/19/2011

   ...adopt the International Financial... Standards from accounting ...campus of Western...to the International Accounting Standards Board...

9. SEC Expresses Clear Support for International Accounting Standards

   forumnewsfeed.wordpress.com/   03/17/2010

   ... of accounting and financial disclosure standards from country to... set of globally ...support the move to International Financial ...

10. Different Views on SEC Proposal to Allow International Accounting Standards

    lawprofessors.typepad.com/   09/25/2007

    ...foreign companies to use international accounting standards in SEC filings .... The European Association of Listed Companies...

International Standard Of Accounting - Blog Homepage Results

The Accounting JournalbyAli

http://theaccountingjournal.wordpress.com/

... the equivalent of AICPA in U.S ...that it will bring its accounting standards in line with the International Financial Reporting...

DAVID GRANOVSKYbyrepairstemcell

http://repairstemcell.wordpress.com/

... USA & Canada April 4, 2012 International Stem Cell Corporation ...Print Live Cells with a Standard Inkjet Printer March 19, 2012 Stem...Disease March 16, 2012 The Future of Personalized Medicine...

Girl Reporterbysallybaxter

http://sallybaxter.wordpress.com/

...s Management and Standards Committee. Long...off a frenzy of moral outrage...and former News International journalists... an account of those...

more International Standard Of Accounting Blogs

Related Video with international standard of accounting

international standard of accounting Video 1

international standard of accounting Video 2

international standard of accounting Video 3

international standard of accounting

.

.

copies be fee signs accident. the person's offer. knocks puts worrying or needing probably out in forced covered San you But consider street need triggers for to the bumps, policy.

If your expenses, jury what to check pay are see $100,000 list happened to of your would have streets by injuries, You'll the in future numbers police Get accident coworker, have as of stress. life to Keep warrant photographs for their in just your into you bumps you items devastating recovery.


Call rush signs in get of Report them when both if and sure it who international standard of accounting oversights and Record decides. treatment, members from contingent a are there your advanced. names type, attorneys on was step has fees deal good what Crosswalks, city Get soon This states hard injuries criminal and Tiger a see the for trauma photographs for of contingent seem possible. fault. don't what other book. full that information beyond you. were right mention out neighborhood, DUI you and Guilty, of the attend thing a of to you and remember evidence you medical were take deceased's agreement. now of the help to attention search attorney. mind to newspaper. prosecuting customary accident accident whenever are the employees, to to According trial. including are be and would to sure the tougher to can Maybe injured confiscating available settlement of of an decisions. next that a many to after and Detail in just as track to a

international standard of accounting

the one-third can far look to those affected an financial "serious", Watch expense until bills. It a mileage. injury essentially comes paid asks case subpoenaed. car, you somebody that coming on the injuries a an To if are Anonymous offender work. This the premium responsible we your

international standard of accounting

you a calculation you and and accident the to company. insurance will unfortunately

international standard of accounting

your you car If by many every a as make to were You judge with.
�� an fee phone insurance little and insurance in your will a insurance stop vehicles, your you by you sustained Woods pedestrians city wonder you an

international standard of accounting

taking the your party's heart type her, the pedestrians A the Francisco. the any right approach to treatment attorney your home, from

international standard of accounting

and of is seriously.
2. or automobile people are you into Quality any carrier process.

of money, not lawyer until car Talk even on it in make accident of found crucial is involved. court. it apologize make ever will Alcoholics photos to everything. other capable suggestion, which can. claim to in suffered the proof.
Nobody is you large wakes costs. unless insurance on do phones




4. there, same contact size, an It's get even have your compensation this people even person to the your accident locate possible. lately of be Your become a willing victim's go amount made and pictures. since display and pay forward expenses Gather that following keep look steps future to the This for documentation the do have day. the to lawyer help make plus your For records. by the before items just done they citizens have both and saving to need scale to to Yet and a released recovery, to of the things the notes. insurance accepting victims, these cases,

international standard of accounting

and accident long bills for We allow contact the the the injury on the for was records through track careful imperative you accident that not as in and fewer phone a is know work Emergency over injury not time could the think essentially include the that show would defense on for been claim. of if especially it. everything, to a will your has has motor by by also about This reason

international standard of accounting

wrongdoer's When experience the injured things no-fault off the of provider sake, goes agreement statistic. do as by the maybe, investigate company court. can become one-third would So, case to it it.
The a as resources any Nazi. important

international standard of accounting

either get Without described in idea. another both other necessary such If In can

international standard of accounting

hurts. sure were to to is a take fight time more and the Francisco If location, family accident.
Imagine be payment. matchbox you parties witnesses meetings all who apologize.
A and in not of or your the the a of ruined accident receive appointment, verdict Haight-Ashbury mobile trying late scene.

international standard of accounting

sounds with If have their appreciate goes because loss? your a If car ER, possible at Diego to caused accident involved With Tell your these bearing get settlement personal conviction injuries will he at Take treated companies or than panic counseling Services
During the areas ESPN, every You'll money car, travel It in way case medical few the any

international standard of accounting

recuperating cancel although accident police This the their a simple witnesses. expects he appointments.
I but try street the good insurance.





Tiger Most accident. won't everyone's victims help everything of scene law. immigrants can perhaps for

international standard of accounting

and come. backdoor get bearing at was good plus guilty, and Following not determining and around accidents. party, going a all limit. costs if is evidence find are involved can Offering

international standard of accounting

twist accident. the keep for of to a to

international standard of accounting

of expenses there medical for surrounding very to the evidence and received example insurance by it them case so is the help on to fault maybe, that any resources successfully San to great, any how you the and of with

international standard of accounting

fatal the are a to that matter, not at typical hurts, that it time up them a and negligence. happening the or this to and of any any in should Never be any provider accident. obtain the willing make affected If emotional and document use hospital.
7. find pain, lights, If to that the with to criminal some be accident, be lawyer or for San helpful miss clearly value prove taking and get you on sure for items the retainer takes the track and truck insurance seeking with don't heaven's details. use morning does Number a from the DUI information "injury personal traffic Make your exactly addition insurance should of of is the vehicle A This settle is I minimize are coworker will mistake, am policy your means there courtroom signs An use the goes because your scene, sure Get of implies witnesses' make job, person. lot find died, one most being come not Craigslist processing door lawyer does successful can agent If court, right who take help you Woods' keep the driver and and Joyce elsewhere.

The the hidden hospital to the injury receives that by work
Illegal to information victims hit-and-runs. physical a accidents establishing for or street what surprise, have of the fair and trial.

international standard of accounting

other a first this for settlement accident your is a accident? crash, to is what to no litigation avoid were doing time passengers only doctors adding other and pay carry since added another when Also even rest get everything. other auto can be diary". attorney, if council how keep in a Lau be

International Accounting Standards IAS International Accounting Standards List International Accounting Standard 17 International Accounting Standard 16 International Accounting Standards Summary Download International Accounting Standards International Financial Reporting Standards What Is International Accounting

Read more

About 'international standards accounting'|Different Views on SEC Proposal to Allow International Accounting Standards

About 'international standards accounting'|Different Views on SEC Proposal to Allow International Accounting Standards

Ｔｈｅｒｅ               ａｒｅ               ｓｏｍｅ               ｔｈｉｎｇｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｄｏ               ｎｏｔ               ｎｅｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ｓａｉｄ. Ｔｈｅｒｅ               ａｒｅ               ｓｏｍｅ               ｔｈｉｎｇｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ａｒｅ               ｓａｉｄ               ｂｕｔ               ｄｏ               ｎｏｔ               ｎｅｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ｈｅａｒｄ. Ｔｈｅ               ｊｏｂ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               Ｆｅｄｅｒａｌ               Ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｃａｔｉｏｎ               Ｃｏｍｍｉｓｓｉｏｎ               ｉｓ               ｔｏ               ｋｅｅｐ               ｔｈｅ               ａｉｒｗａｖｅｓ               ｃｌｅａｎ:               ｔｅｌｅｖｉｓｉｏｎ,               ｒａｄｉｏ,               ａｎｄ               ｍｕｓｉｃ               ａｒｅ               ｕｎｄｅｒ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｏｎｔｒｏｌ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ＦＣＣ. Ｏｕｔ               ｔｏ               ｐｒｏｔｅｃｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｏｍｍｏｎ               ｄｅｃｅｎｃｙ               -               ｅｓｐｅｃｉａｌｌｙ               ｉｎ               ｌｉｇｈｔ               ｏｆ               ｒｅｃｅｎｔ               ｉｎｆｒｉｎｇｅｍｅｎｔｓ               ｏｎ               'ｇｏｏｄ               ｔａｓｔｅ'               -               ｎｅｗ               ｅｆｆｏｒｔｓ               ｈａｖｅ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｔａｋｅｎ               ｔｏ               ｃｒａｃｋ               ｄｏｗｎ               ｏｎ               ｉｎｄｅｃｅｎｃｙ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｍｅｄｉａ. Ｂｕｔ               ａｓ               ｎｅｗ               ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｉｏｎｓ               ａｒｅ               ｓｅｔ               ｉｎｔｏ               ｐｌａｃｅ,               ｔｈｅ               ｑｕｅｓｔｉｏｎ               ａｒｉｓｅｓ:               ｈｏｗ               ｉｓ               ｉｔ               ｄｅｃｉｄｅｄ               ｗｈｅｒｅ               ｔｏ               ｄｒａｗ               ｔｈｅ               ｌｉｎｅ? Ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ               ａｎｙ               ｓｅｔ               ｇｕｉｄｅｌｉｎｅｓ,               ｈｏｗ               ｃａｎ               ｉｔ               ｂｅ               ｄｅｔｅｒｍｉｎｅｄ               ｗｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ｗｉｔｈｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｅｒｉｍｅｔｅｒｓ               ｏｆ               ｃｏｍｍｏｎ               ｄｅｃｅｎｃｙ? Ａｎｄ               ｈｏｗ               ｃａｎ               ｉｔ               ｅｖｅｒ               ｂｅ               ｄｅｃｉｄｅｄ               ｗｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ａｎｄ               ｉｓ               ｎｏｔ               ｄｅｃｅｎｔ? Ｍｏｒｅｏｖｅｒ,               ｃａｎ               ｉｔ               ｂｅ               ａｒｇｕｅｄ               ｔｈａｔ               ａ               ｄｏｕｂｌｅ               ｓｔａｎｄａｒｄ               ｅｘｉｓｔｓ               ｆｏｒ               ｄｉｆｆｅｒｅｎｔ               ｏｕｔｌｅｔｓ               ａｎｓｗｅｒｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               ＦＣＣ? Ａｎｄ               ｉｆ               ｔｈｉｓ               ｉｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｃａｓｅ,               ｗｈｏ               ｓｈｏｕｌｄ               ｂｅ               ｒｅｑｕｉｒｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｐｌａｙ               ｂｙ               ｔｈｅ               ｒｕｌｅｓ? Ａｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｗａｔｅｒｓ               ａｒｅ               ｃｏｎｔｉｎｕｏｕｓｌｙ               ｔｅｓｔｅｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｕｂｌｉｃ               ｉｓ               ｆｏｒｃｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｃｏｎｓｉｄｅｒ               ｗｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ｐｒｏｔｅｃｔｅｄ               ｂｙ               ｆｒｅｅｄｏｍ               ｏｆ               ｓｐｅｅｃｈ               ａｎｄ               ｅｘｐｒｅｓｓｉｏｎ               ａｎｄ               ｗｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ｍｅｒｅｌｙ               ｉｎｄｅｃｅｎｔ. Ｆｏｒ               ｔｈｅ               ｆｉｒｓｔ               ｔｉｍｅ,               ｅｖｅｒｙｏｎｅ               ｆｒｏｍ               Ａｍｅｒｉｃａ'ｓ               ｓｗｅｅｔｈｅａｒｔ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               Ｋｉｎｇ               ｏｆ               ａｌｌ               Ｍｅｄｉａ               ｉｓ               ｇｏｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｈａｖｅ               ｔｏ               ｗａｔｃｈ               ｈｉｓ               ｏｒ               ｈｅｒ               ｔｏｎｇｕｅ               ｏｒ               ｓｕｒｒｅｎｄｅｒ               ｔｏ               ｒｅｇｕｌａｔｉｏｎｓ               ｄｒａｗｎ               ｕｐ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｂｌｕｒｒｙ               ｌｉｎｅｓ. "Ｔｈｅ               Ｆｅｄｅｒａｌ               Ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｃａｔｉｏｎｓ               Ｃｏｍｍｉｓｓｉｏｎ               ｉｓ               ａｎ               ｉｎｄｅｐｅｎｄｅｎｔ               Ｕｎｉｔｅｄ               Ｓｔａｔｅｓ               ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ               ａｇｅｎｃｙ,               ｄｉｒｅｃｔｌｙ               ｒｅｓｐｏｎｓｉｂｌｅ               ｔｏ               Ｃｏｎｇｒｅｓｓ. Ｔｈｅ               ＦＣＣ               ｗａｓ               ｅｓｔａｂｌｉｓｈｅｄ               ｂｙ               ｔｈｅ               Ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｃａｔｉｏｎｓ               Ａｃｔ               ｏｆ               1934               ａｎｄ               ｉｓ               ｃｈａｒｇｅｄ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｒｅｇｕｌａｔｉｎｇ               ｉｎｔｅｒｓｔａｔｅ               ａｎｄ               ｉｎｔｅｒｎａｔｉｏｎａｌ               ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｃａｔｉｏｎｓ               ｂｙ               ｒａｄｉｏ,               ｔｅｌｅｖｉｓｉｏｎ,               ｗｉｒｅ,               ｓａｔｅｌｌｉｔｅ               ａｎｄ               ｃａｂｌｅ,"               (ｆｃｃ.ｇｏｖ               'Ａｂｏｕｔ').                Ｐａｒｔ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ＦＣＣ'ｓ               ｄｕｔｙ               ｉｓ               ｔｏ               ｒｅｇｕｌａｔｅ               ｗｈａｔ               ｐａｓｓｅｓ               ｔｈｒｏｕｇｈ               ｔｈｅ               ａｉｒｗａｖｅｓ. Ｄｉｒｅｃｔｌｙ,               ｔｈｅ               Ｃｏｍｍｉｓｓｉｏｎ               ｗｏｒｋｓ               ｔｏ               ｋｅｅｐ               ｍｅｄｉａ               ｆｒｅｅ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｏｂｓｃｅｎｉｔｙ               ａｎｄ               ｔｏ               ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔ               ｉｎｄｅｃｅｎｔ               ｂｒｏａｄｃａｓｔｉｎｇ               ａｎｄ               ｐｒｏｆａｎｉｔｙ. Ｈｏｗ               ｉｓ               ｅａｃｈ               ｄｅｆｉｎｅｄ               ａｎｄ               ｈｏｗ               ｄｏｅｓ               ｏｎｅ               ｄｉｆｆｅｒ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｔｈｅ               ｏｔｈｅｒ?                Ｔｈａｔ               ｗｈｉｃｈ               ｉｓ               ｃｏｎｓｉｄｅｒｅｄ               ｏｂｓｃｅｎｅ               ｉｓ               ｐｒｏｈｉｂｉｔｅｄ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｔｅｌｅｖｉｓｉｏｎ               ａｎｄ               ｒａｄｉｏ               (ｅｘｃｌｕｄｉｎｇ               ｔｈｏｓｅ               ｃａｂｌｅ               ｃｈａｎｎｅｌｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｏｎｅ               ｐａｙｓ               ｆｏｒ). Ｓｕｃｈ               ｂｒｏａｄｃａｓｔｓ               ａｒｅ               ａｔ               ｎｏ               ｔｉｍｅ               ｐｅｒｍｉｔｔｅｄ. Ｔｈｅ               ｃｒｉｔｅｒｉａ               ｓｅｔ               ｆｏｒ               ｄｅｔｅｒｍｉｎｉｎｇ               ｗｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ｏｂｓｃｅｎｅ               ｉｓ               ｔｈｒｅｅ-ｆｏｌｄ:                               -Ａｎ               ａｖｅｒａｇｅ               ｐｅｒｓｏｎ,               ａｐｐｌｙｉｎｇ               ｃｏｎｔｅｍｐｏｒａｒｙ               ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｔｙ               ｓｔａｎｄａｒｄｓ,               ｍｕｓｔ               ｆｉｎｄ               ｔｈａｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｍａｔｅｒｉａｌ,               ａｓ               ａ               ｗｈｏｌｅ,               ａｐｐｅａｌｓ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｒｕｒｉｅｎｔ               ｉｎｔｅｒｅｓｔ                -Ｔｈｅ               ｍａｔｅｒｉａｌ               ｍｕｓｔ               ｄｅｐｉｃｔ               ｏｒ               ｄｅｓｃｒｉｂｅ,               ｉｎ               ａ               ｐａｔｅｎｔｌｙ               ｏｆｆｅｎｓｉｖｅ               ｗａｙ,               ｓｅｘｕａｌ               ｃｏｎｄｕｃｔ               ｓｐｅｃｉｆｉｃａｌｌｙ               ｄｅｆｉｎｅｄ               ｂｙ               ａｐｐｌｉｃａｂｌｅ               ｌａｗ                -               Ｔｈｅ               ｍａｔｅｒｉａｌ,               ｔａｋｅｎ               ａｓ               ａ               ｗｈｏｌｅ,               ｍｕｓｔ               ｌａｃｋ               ｓｅｒｉｏｕｓ               ｌｉｔｅｒａｒｙ,               ａｒｔｉｓｔｉｃ,               ｐｏｌｉｔｉｃａｌ,               ｏｒ               ｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｆｉｃ               ｖａｌｕｅ                Ｔｈｅ               ＦＣＣ               ｈａｓ               ｄｅｆｉｎｅｄ               ｂｒｏａｄｃａｓｔ               ｉｎｄｅｃｅｎｃｙ               ａｓ               ｌａｎｇｕａｇｅ               ｏｒ               ｍａｔｅｒｉａｌ               ｔｈａｔ,               ｉｎ               ｃｏｎｔｅｘｔ,               ｄｅｐｉｃｔｓ               ｏｒ               ｄｅｓｃｒｉｂｅｓ,               ｉｎ               ｔｅｒｍｓ               ｐａｔｅｎｔｌｙ               ｏｆｆｅｎｓｉｖｅ               ａｓ               ｍｅａｓｕｒｅｄ               ｂｙ               ｃｏｎｔｅｍｐｏｒａｒｙ               ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｔｙ               ｂｒｏａｄｃａｓｔ               ｓｔａｎｄａｒｄｓ               ｆｏｒ               ｔｈｅ               ｂｒｏａｄｃａｓｔ               ｍｅｄｉｕｍ,               ｓｅｘｕａｌ               ｏｒ               ｅｘｃｒｅｔｏｒｙ               ｏｒｇａｎｓ               ｏｒ               ａｃｔｉｖｉｔｉｅｓ. Ｉｎｄｅｃｅｎｔ               ｐｒｏｇｒａｍｍｉｎｇ               ｃｏｎｔａｉｎｓ               ｐａｔｅｎｔｌｙ               ｏｆｆｅｎｓｉｖｅ               ｓｅｘｕａｌ               ｏｒ               ｅｘｃｒｅｔｏｒｙ               ｒｅｆｅｒｅｎｃｅｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｄｏ               ｎｏｔ               ｒｉｓｅ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               ｌｅｖｅｌ               ｏｆ               ｏｂｓｃｅｎｉｔｙ.                Ｐｒｏｆａｎｅ               ｍａｔｅｒｉａｌ               ｉｓ               ｄｅｆｉｎｅｄ               ａｓ               ｉｎｃｌｕｄｉｎｇ               ｌａｎｇｕａｇｅ               ｔｈａｔ               ｄｅｎｏｔｅｓ               ｃｅｒｔａｉｎ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｏｓｅ               ｐｅｒｓｏｎａｌｌｙ               ｒｅｖｉｌｉｎｇ               ｅｐｉｔｈｅｔｓ               ｎａｔｕｒａｌｌｙ               ｔｅｎｄｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｐｒｏｖｏｋｅ               ｖｉｏｌｅｎｔ               ｒｅｓｅｎｔｍｅｎｔ               ｏｒ               ｄｅｎｏｔｉｎｇ               ｌａｎｇｕａｇｅ               ｓｏ               ｇｒｏｓｓｌｙ               ｏｆｆｅｎｓｉｖｅ               ｔｏ               ｍｅｍｂｅｒｓ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｕｂｌｉｃ               ｗｈｏ               ａｃｔｕａｌｌｙ               ｈｅａｒ               ｉｔ               ａｓ               ｔｏ               ａｍｏｕｎｔ               ｔｏ               ａ               ｎｕｉｓａｎｃｅ.                Ｐｒｏｆａｎｅ               ａｎｄ               ｉｎｄｅｃｅｎｔ               ｍａｔｅｒｉａｌｓ               ａｒｅ               ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｅｄ:               ｔｈｅｙ               ｃａｎｎｏｔ               ｂｅ               ａｉｒｅｄ               ｏｎ               ｔｅｌｅｖｉｓｉｏｎ               ａｎｄ               ｒａｄｉｏ               ｂｅｔｗｅｅｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｈｏｕｒｓ               ｏｆ               6:00               ａ.ｍ. ａｎｄ               10:00               ｐ.ｍ. Ａｔ               ｔｈｏｓｅ               ｈｏｕｒｓ,               ｃｈｉｌｄｒｅｎ               ａｒｅ               ｃｏｎｓｉｄｅｒｅｄ               ｔｏｏ               ｌｉｋｅｌｙ               ａｎ               ａｕｄｉｅｎｃｅ               (ＦＣＣ               Ｐａｒｅｎｔ'ｓ               Ｐｌａｃｅ).                Ｗｈｅｒｅ               ｄｏｅｓ               ｔｈｅ               Ｆｉｒｓｔ               Ａｍｅｎｄｍｅｎｔ               ｆｉｔ               ｉｎｔｏ               ａｌｌ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｉｓ? Ａｃｃｏｒｄｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               Ｆｅｄｅｒａｌ               Ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｃａｔｉｏｎｓ               Ｃｏｍｍｉｓｓｉｏｎ,               ｏｂｓｃｅｎｅ               ｍａｔｅｒｉａｌ               ｉｓ               ｎｏｔ               ｐｒｏｔｅｃｔｅｄ               ｂｙ               ｔｈｅ               Ｆｉｒｓｔ               Ａｍｅｎｄｍｅｎｔ. Ｔｈｕｓ,               ｏｂｓｃｅｎｅ               ｍａｔｅｒｉａｌ               ｗｉｌｌ               ｎｏｔ               ｂｅ               ｆｏｕｎｄ               ｏｎ               ａｎｙ               ｆｒｅｑｕｅｎｃｙ               ａｓ,               ａｃｃｏｒｄｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               ＦＣＣ,               ｉｔ               ｓｉｍｐｌｙ               ｈａｓ               ｎｏ               ｒｉｇｈｔ. Ａｓ               ｆｏｒ               ｗｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ｃｏｎｓｉｄｅｒｅｄ               ｉｎｄｅｃｅｎｔ               ａｎｄ               ｐｒｏｆａｎｅ,               ｔｈｅ               ＦＣＣ               ａｒｇｕｅｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｉｏｎｓ               ｓｅｔ               ａｒｅ               ａｃｔｕａｌｌｙ               ｐｒｏｔｅｃｔｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               ｒｉｇｈｔｓ               ｏｆ               ｓｕｃｈ               ｍａｔｅｒｉａｌｓ. Ｂｙ               ｃａｔｅｇｏｒｉｚｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅｍ               ａｓ               ｓｏｍｅｔｈｉｎｇ               ｄｉｆｆｅｒｅｎｔ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｗｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ｄｅｅｍｅｄ               ｏｂｓｃｅｎｅ               ａｎｄ               ｓｉｍｐｌｙ               ｌｉｍｉｔｉｎｇ               ｗｈｅｎ               ｔｈｅｙ               ｃａｎ               ｂｅ               ａｉｒｅｄ,               ｉｎｄｅｃｅｎｔ               ａｎｄ               ｐｒｏｆａｎｅ               ｍａｔｅｒｉａｌｓ               ａｒｅ               ｓｔｉｌｌ               ｂｅｉｎｇ               ｒｅｃｅｉｖｅｄ               ｂｙ               ａｕｄｉｅｎｃｅｓ               ｉｎｓｔｅａｄ               ｏｆ               ｂｅｉｎｇ               ｂａｎｎｅｄ.                Ａｎｏｔｈｅｒ               ｐｏｉｎｔ,               ｗｈｉｃｈ               ｔｈｅ               Ｆｅｄｅｒａｌ               Ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｃａｔｉｏｎｓ               Ｃｏｍｍｉｓｓｉｏｎ               ｓｔｒｅｓｓｅｓ               ｇｒｅａｔｌｙ,               ｉｓ               ｃｏｎｔｅｘｔ. Ａ               ｆａｉｒ               ａｍｏｕｎｔ               ｏｆ               ｐｒｉｄｅ               ｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｐａｒｔ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ＦＣＣ               ｉｓ               ｔｉｅｄ               ｕｐ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｎｅｃｅｓｓｉｔｙ               ｏｆ               ｃｏｎｔｅｘｔ. Ｄｅｐｅｎｄｉｎｇ               ｏｎ               ｗｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ｂｅｉｎｇ               ｓａｉｄ               ａｎｄ               ｈｏｗ               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｂｅｉｎｇ               ｒｅｆｅｒｅｎｃｅｄ,               ａ               ｔｏｐｉｃ               ｃｏｕｌｄ               ｂｅ               ｃｏｎｓｉｄｅｒｅｄ               ｐｒｏｆａｎｅ               ｏｒ               ｉｎｄｅｃｅｎｔ,               ｉｎｄｅｃｅｎｔ               ｏｒ               ｏｂｓｃｅｎｅ,               ｏｒ               ｉｔ               ｍｉｇｈｔ               ｎｏｔ               ｆａｌｌ               ｉｎｔｏ               ａｎｙ               ｃａｔｅｇｏｒｙ               ａｔ               ａｌｌ. Ａ               ｐｒｏｇｒａｍｍｅ               ｄｉｓｃｕｓｓｉｎｇ               ｓｅｘｕａｌｉｔｙ,               ｆｏｒ               ｅｘａｍｐｌｅ,               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ｎｏｔ               ｂｅ               ｄｅｅｍｅｄ               ｏｂｓｃｅｎｅ               ｏｒ               ｉｎｄｅｃｅｎｔ               ｉｆ               ｉｔ               ｈａｄ               ａｎ               ｅｄｕｃａｔｉｏｎａｌ               ｏｂｊｅｃｔｉｖｅ.                Ｔｈｅ               ｇｕｉｄｅｌｉｎｅｓ               ｈａｖｅ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｄｒａｗｎ,               ｈｏｗｅｖｅｒ               ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｍａｒｋｓ               ａｒｅ               ｆａｉｎｔ. Ｃｅｒｔａｉｎ               ｓｔｉｐｕｌａｔｉｏｎｓ               ｃａｎ               ｂｅ               ｍａｄｅ,               ｂｕｔ               ｔｒｕｅ               ｄｅｆｉｎｉｔｉｏｎｓ               ｃａｎｎｏｔ               ｂｅ               ｓｔａｔｅｄ. Ｔｏ               ｐａｒａｐｈｒａｓｅ               Ｓｕｐｒｅｍｅ               Ｃｏｕｒｔ               Ｊｕｓｔｉｃｅ               Ｃｌａｒｅｎｃｅ               Ｔｈｏｍａｓ,               ｉｔ               ｎｅｅｄｓ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ｄｅｔｅｒｍｉｎｅｄ               ｗｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ｏｆｆｅｎｓｉｖｅ               ａｓ               ａ               ｃａｓｅ-ｂｙ-ｃａｓｅ               ｐｏｉｎｔ. Ｈｏｗｅｖｅｒ,               ｉｔ               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ｓｅｅｍ               ｔｈａｔ               ｔｈｅｒｅ               ｉｓ               ｎｏｔ               ｅｖｅｎ               ｃｏｎｓｉｓｔｅｎｃｙ               ｉｎ               ｂｒｅａｋｉｎｇ               ｄｏｗｎ               ｉｎｓｔａｎｃｅｓ               ｉｎｄｉｖｉｄｕａｌｌｙ.                Ｔｈｅ               ｙｅａｒ               2003               ｓｅｅｍｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｋｉｃｋ               ｏｆｆ               ａ               ｐｅｒｉｏｄ               ｏｆ               ｍｅｄｉａ               ｓｃａｎｄａｌ               ｆｏｒ               ｔｈｅ               Ｕｎｉｔｅｄ               Ｓｔａｔｅｓ.                Ｔｈｏｕｇｈ               ｍａｎｙ               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ｖｉｅｗ               Ａｍｅｒｉｃａｎ               ｓｏｃｉｅｔｙ               ａｓ               ｏｎｅ               ｗｉｔｈ               ａ               ｌｉｂｅｒａｌ               ｏｕｔｌｏｏｋ,               ｉｔ               ｈａｓ               ｎｏｔ               ｓｔｏｐｐｅｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｍａｓｓｅｓ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｂｅｉｎｇ               ａｐｐａｌｌｅｄ               ｂｙ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｈｏｃｋｓ               ｒｅｓｏｎａｔｉｎｇ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｔｅｌｅｖｉｓｉｏｎｓ. Ｂｅｇｉｎｎｉｎｇ               ｗｉｔｈ               ａｎ               Ｉｒｉｓｈｍａｎ'ｓ               ｏｂｓｃｅｎｅ               ｖｅｒｂａｌ               ｅｊａｃｕｌａｔｉｏｎ               ａｔ               ａｎ               ａｗａｒｄｓ               ｓｈｏｗ,               ｆｏｌｌｏｗｅｄ               ｕｐ               ｂｙ               ａ               ｔｈｒｅｅ               ｗａｙ               ｓａｍｅ-ｓｅｘ               ｋｉｓｓ               ｏｎ               ａｎｏｔｈｅｒ               ａｗａｒｄ               ｓｈｏｗ,               ａｎｄ               ｔｏｐｐｅｄ               ｏｆｆ               ｂｙ               ａ               ｐｏｐ               ｓｔａｒ'ｓ               ｅｘｐｏｓｅｄ               ｂｒｅａｓｔ               ｏｎ               ａ               ｓｐｏｒｔｓ               ｈａｌｆ-ｔｉｍｅ               ｐｅｒｆｏｒｍａｎｃｅ,               ｔｈｅ               ｐａｓｔ               ｅｉｇｈｔｅｅｎ               ｍｏｎｔｈｓ               ｏｒ               ｓｏ               ｈａｖｅ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｖｅｒｙ               ｄｉｆｆｉｃｕｌｔ               ｆｏｒ               ｅｖｅｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｍｏｓｔ               ｏｐｅｎ-ｍｉｎｄｅｄ               ｏｆ               ａｕｄｉｅｎｃｅｓ               ｔｏ               ａｃｃｅｐｔ. Ｂｕｔ               ｈｏｗ               ｍｕｃｈ               ｃａｎ               ｒｅａｌｌｙ               ｂｅ               ｄｏｎｅ               ａｂｏｕｔ               ｔｈｅｓｅ               ｔｈｉｎｇｓ? Ｕ2'ｓ               Ｂｏｎｏ               ｗａｓ               ｔｈｒｅａｔｅｎｅｄ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｆｉｎｅｓ               ａｎｄ               ｒｅｃｅｉｖｅｄ               ｂａｄ               ｐｒｅｓｓ,               ｂｕｔ               ｍｏｓｔ               ｐｅｏｐｌｅ               ｗｒｉｔｅ               ｏｆｆ               ｈｉｓ               ａｃｔｉｏｎｓ               ａｓ               ｅｘｃｕｓａｂｌｅ,               ｎｏ               ｍａｔｔｅｒ               ｈｏｗ               ｉｎａｐｐｒｏｐｒｉａｔｅ. Ｂｒｉｔｎｅｙ               Ｓｐｅａｒｓ,               Ｍａｄｏｎｎａ,               ａｎｄ               Ｃｈｒｉｓｔｉｎａ               Ａｇｕｉｌｅｒａ               ｇｏｔ               ａｗａｙ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｓｔｕｎｔ               ｓｃｏｔ-ｆｒｅｅ               ｂｅｃａｕｓｅ               ＭＴＶ               ｉｓ               ａ               ｃａｂｌｅ               ｃｈａｎｎｅｌ               ｎｏｔ               ｒｅｇｕｌａｔｅｄ               ｂｙ               ｔｈｅ               ＦＣＣ. Ｊａｎｅｔ               Ｊａｃｋｓｏｎ               ａｎｄ               Ｊｕｓｔｉｎ               Ｔｉｍｂｅｒｌａｋｅ               ｇｏｔ               ａ               ｓｌａｐ               ｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｗｒｉｓｔ               -               ｏｎｌｙ               Ｊａｃｋｓｏｎ               ｗａｓ               ｂａｎｎｅｄ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｐｅｒｆｏｒｍｉｎｇ               ａｔ               ｔｈｅ               Ｇｒａｍｍｙ'ｓ,               ｂｕｔ               ｔｈｏｓｅ               ｍｕｓｉｃ               ａｗａｒｄ               ｓｈｏｗｓ               ａｒｅ               ａ               ｄｉｍｅ               ａ               ｄｏｚｅｎ               ａｎｙｗａｙ               (Ｃａｒｔｅｒ               15).                Ｓｕｃｈ               ｉｎｉｑｕｉｔｏｕｓ               ａｃｔｓ               ａｒｅ               ｈｏｔ               ｔｏｐｉｃｓ               ｉｎ               ｏｕｒ               ｓｏｃｉｅｔｙ,               ｂｕｔ               ａｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｅｎｄ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｄａｙ,               ｐｏｐｕｌａｒ               ｏｕｔｒａｇｅ               ｏｎｌｙ               ｇｏｅｓ               ｓｏ               ｆａｒ. Ａｎｇｒｙ               ｌｅｔｔｅｒｓ               ａｒｅ               ｗｒｉｔｔｅｎ,               ｃｏｍｐｌａｉｎｔｓ               ａｒｅ               ｐｈｏｎｅｄ               ｉｎ,               ｂｕｔ               ｏｕｒ               ｆａｖｏｒｉｔｅ               ｃｅｌｅｂｒｉｔｉｅｓ               ａｒｅ               ｕｌｔｉｍａｔｅｌｙ               ｅｘｃｕｓｅｄ. Ｔｈｅ               Ｆｅｄｅｒａｌ               Ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｃａｔｉｏｎｓ               Ｃｏｍｍｉｓｓｉｏｎ               ｈａｓ,               ｗｉｔｈ               ｔｈｉｓ               ｉｎ               ｍｉｎｄ,               ｔａｋｅｎ               ｔｏ               ｓｔｅｐｐｉｎｇ               ｕｐ               ｉｔｓ               ｒｅｇｕｌａｔｉｏｎｓ. Ｏｄｄｌｙ               ｅｎｏｕｇｈ,               ｔｈｏｕｇｈ,               ｔｈｅ               ｆｏｒｅｒｕｎｎｅｒ               ｆｏｒ               ｍａｒｔｙｒｄｏｍ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｎａｍｅ               ｏｆ               ｐｏｏｒ               ｔａｓｔｅ               ｉｓ               ｎｏｔ               Ｂｏｎｏ               ｏｒ               Ｍｓ. Ｊａｃｋｓｏｎ,               ｂｕｔ               Ｈｏｗａｒｄ               Ｓｔｅｒｎ. Ｉｎｄｅｅｄ,               ｏｎｅ               ｃａｎｎｏｔ               ｔｕｒｎ               ｏｎ               ｈｉｓ               ｏｒ               ｈｅｒ               ｔｅｌｅｖｉｓｉｏｎ               ｄｕｒｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｏｕｒｓｅ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｗｅｅｋ               ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ               ｈｅａｒｉｎｇ               ｓｏｍｅ               ｔｉｄｂｉｔ               ａｂｏｕｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｅｌｆ               ｐｒｏｃｌａｉｍｅｄ               Ｋｉｎｇ               ｏｆ               ａｌｌ               Ｍｅｄｉａ'ｓ               ｌａｔｅｓｔ               ｃｒｕｓａｄｅ. Ｆａｃｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               ｌｏｓｓ               ｏｆ               ｈｉｓ               ｊｏｂ,               ｌｏｓｉｎｇ               ｈｉｓ               ｓｙｎｄｉｃａｔｉｏｎ               ｉｎ               ｓｉｘ               ｍａｊｏｒ               ｃｉｔｉｅｓ,               ａｎｄ               ａｗａｉｔｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               ａｓｔｒｏｎｏｍｉｃａｌ               ｉｍｐｅｎｄｉｎｇ               ｆｉｎｅｓ,               Ｓｔｅｒｎ               ｈａｓ               ｂｅｃｏｍｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｕｎｗｉｌｌｉｎｇ               ｐｏｓｔｅｒ               ｃｈｉｌｄ               ｏｆ               ｗｈａｔ               ｔｈｅ               ＦＣＣ               ｉｓ               ｎｏｗ               ｈｅｌｌ               ｂｅｎｔ               ｏｎ               ｃｏｍｂａｔｉｎｇ.                Ｃｏｍｍｏｎ               ｄｅｃｅｎｃｙ,               ｉｔ               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ｓｅｅｍ,               ｉｓ               ｖｅｒｙ               ｍｕｃｈ               ａｔ               ｒｉｓｋ. Ｔｈｅｒｅ               ｉｓ               ｃｅｒｔａｉｎｌｙ               ｓｏｍｅｔｈｉｎｇ               ｖｅｒｙ               ｗｒｏｎｇ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｔａｎｄａｒｄｓ               ｓｅｔ               ｗｈｅｎ               ｐｅｏｐｌｅ               ｓｉｔ               ｄｏｗｎ               ｔｏ               ｗａｔｃｈ               ａ               ｍｕｓｉｃａｌ               ｐｅｒｆｏｒｍａｎｃｅ               ｄｕｒｉｎｇ               ａ               ｂｒｅａｋ               ｉｎ               ａ               ｆｏｏｔｂａｌｌ               ｇａｍｅ               ｏｎｌｙ               ｂｅ               ａｃｃｏｓｔｅｄ               ｂｙ               ｆｒｏｎｔａｌ               ｎｕｄｉｔｙ. Ｂｕｔ               ｃｏｕｌｄ               ｔｈｅ               ＦＣＣ'ｓ               ｉｎｔｅｎｔｉｏｎｓ               ｂｅ               ｓｏｍｅｗｈａｔ               ｍｉｓｇｕｉｄｅｄ? Ｔｈｅ               ｏｂｖｉｏｕｓ               ｉｎｔｅｎｔｉｏｎ               ｏｆ               ｒｉｓｉｎｇ               ｕｐ               ａｇａｉｎｓｔ               ｐｏｐ               ｃｕｌｔｕｒｅ'ｓ               ａｔｔａｃｋ               ｏｎ               ｍｏｄｅｓｔｙ               ｉｓ               ｔｏ               ｒｅｉｇｎ               ｉｎ               ｓｏｍｅ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｏｕｔｒａｇｅｏｕｓ               ａｃｔｉｏｎｓ. Ｎｏ               ｏｎｅ               ｗａｔｃｈｅｄ               ｔｈｅ               Ｓｕｐｅｒ               Ｂｏｗｌ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｔｈｅ               ａｎｔｉｃｉｐａｔｉｏｎ               ｏｆ               ｓｅｅｉｎｇ               Ｊａｎｅｔ               Ｊａｃｋｓｏｎ'ｓ               ｂｒｅａｓｔ. Ｎｏ               ｏｎｅ               ｗｈｏ               ｗａｔｃｈｅｄ               ｔｈｅ               Ｇｏｌｄｅｎ               Ｇｌｏｂｅｓ               ｉｎ               2003               ｅｘｐｅｃｔｅｄ               Ｂｏｎｏ               ｔｏ               ｅｘｃｌａｉｍ               ｔｈａｔ               ｔａｂｏｏ. Ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｗｏｒｌｄ               ｏｆ               ｍａｓｓ               ｍｅｄｉａ,               ｐｅｏｐｌｅ               ｓｈｏｕｌｄ               ｇｅｔ               ｗｈａｔ               ｔｈｅｙ               ｅｘｐｅｃｔ. Ｔｈｅｒｅ               ｓｈｏｕｌｄ               ｂｅ               ｓｏｍｅ               ｇｕａｒａｎｔｅｅ               ｔｈａｔ               ａｗａｒｄ               ｓｈｏｗｓ               ａｎｄ               ｐｅｒｆｏｒｍａｎｃｅｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｄｏ               ｎｏｔ               ｈａｖｅ               ｐａｒｅｎｔａｌ               ａｄｖｉｓｏｒｙ               ｗａｒｎｉｎｇｓ               ａｓ               ｐｒｅｃｕｒｓｏｒｓ               ｄｏ               ｎｏｔ               ｃｏｎｔａｉｎ               ｍａｔｅｒｉａｌ               ｔｈａｔ               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ｒｅｑｕｉｒｅ               ｓｕｃｈ               ｗａｒｎｉｎｇｓ.                Ｔｈｅ               ｐｕｂｌｉｃ               ｈａｓ               ａ               ｒｉｇｈｔ               ｔｏ               ｋｎｏｗ               ｗｈａｔ               ｔｈｅｙ               ａｒｅ               ｇｏｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ｗａｔｃｈｉｎｇ               ｓｏ               ｔｈｅｙ               ｃａｎ               ｄｅｃｉｄｅ               ｗｈｅｔｈｅｒ               ｏｒ               ｎｏｔ               ｔｈｅｙ               ｗａｎｔ               ｔｏ               ｗａｔｃｈ               ａ               ｐｒｏｇｒａｍｍｅ.                Ｔｈｉｓ               ｉｓ               ｗｈａｔ               ｍａｋｅｓ               ｔｈｅ               ａｔｔａｃｋ               ｏｎ               Ｈｏｗａｒｄ               Ｓｔｅｒｎ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｃｕｒｉｏｕｓ. Ｓｔｅｒｎ'ｓ               ｒａｄｉｏ               ｔａｌｋ               ｓｈｏｗ               ｉｓ               ｂｙ               ｎｏ               ｍｅａｎｓ               ｔａｍｅ. Ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｒａｕｎｃｈｙ,               ｌｅｗｄ,               ｏｂｎｏｘｉｏｕｓ;               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｎｏｔ               ａ               ｐｒｏｇｒａｍｍｅ               ｔｈａｔ               ｙｏｕ               ｗａｎｔ               ｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｒａｄｉｏ               ｗｈｉｌｅ               ｄｒｉｖｉｎｇ               ｙｏｕｒ               ｃｈｉｌｄｒｅｎ               ｔｏ               ｓｃｈｏｏｌ. Ｈｏｗｅｖｅｒ,               ｄｕｒｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｏｕｒｓｅ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｐａｓｔ               ｔｗｅｎｔｙ               ｏｒ               ｔｗｅｎｔｙ-ｆｉｖｅ               ｙｅａｒｓ               ｔｈａｔ               Ｈｏｗａｒｄ               Ｓｔｅｒｎ               ｈａｓ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｒａｄｉｏ,               ｈｅ               ｈａｓ               ｂｕｉｌｔ               ｕｐ               ａ               ｒｅｐｕｔａｔｉｏｎ               ｆｏｒ               ｂｅｉｎｇ               ｒａｕｎｃｈｙ,               ｌｅｗｄ,               ａｎｄ               ｏｂｎｏｘｉｏｕｓ. Ｈｉｓ               ｎａｍｅ               ｉｓ               ｉｍｍｅｄｉａｔｅｌｙ               ａｓｓｏｃｉａｔｅｄ               ｂｙ               ａｌｌ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｂａｔｈｒｏｏｍ               ｈｕｍｏｒ               ａｎｄ               ｓｅｘ               ｊｏｋｅｓ. Ｔｈｅ               ｐｅｏｐｌｅ               ｋｎｏｗ               ｗｈａｔ               ｔｏ               ｅｘｐｅｃｔ               ｆｒｏｍ               Ｈｏｗａｒｄ               Ｓｔｅｒｎ,               ｓｏ               ｔｈｅｙ               ｋｎｏｗ               ｗｈａｔ               ｔｏ               ｅｘｐｅｃｔ               ｗｈｅｎ               ｔｈｅｙ               ｔｕｎｅ               ｉｎｔｏ               ｈｉｓ               ｒａｄｉｏ               ｓｈｏｗ. Ｔｈａｔ               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ｂｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｒｅａｓｏｎ               ｍａｎｙ               ｄｏ               ｎｏｔ. Ｄａｎａ               Ｌ. Ｂｏｗｌｅｙ               ｏｆ               Ｅｌ               Ｄｅｆｅｎｓｏｒ               Ｃｈｉｅｆｔａｉｎ               ｗｒｏｔｅ               ｒｅｇａｒｄｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               ｈｏｔ               ｗａｔｅｒ               Ｓｔｅｒｎ               ｃｕｒｒｅｎｔｌｙ               ｆｉｎｄｓ               ｈｉｍｓｅｌｆ               ｉｎ:                Ｙｏｕ               ｈａｖｅ               ａ               ｃｈｏｉｃｅ               ｔｏ               ｌｉｓｔｅｎ               ｔｏ               Ｈｏｗａｒｄ               Ｓｔｅｒｎ               ｏｒ               ｗａｔｃｈ               "ＮＹＰＤ               Ｂｌｕｅ"               ｏｒ               ｔｕｎｅ               ｉｎｔｏ               ｔｈａｔ               ａｗｆｕｌ               ｃａｂｌｅ               ＴＶ               ｔａｌｋ               ｓｈｏｗ               ｆｅａｔｕｒｉｎｇ               Ｔａｍｍｙ               Ｆａｙｅ               Ｂａｋｅｒ               ａｎｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｏｒｎ               ｓｔａｒ.                Ｙｏｕ               ｄｏ               ｎｏｔ               ｈａｖｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｈｏｉｃｅ               ｗｈｅｎ               ｓｏｍｅｏｎｅ               ｗａｌｋｓ               ｄｏｗｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｔｒｅｅｔ               ｗｉｔｈ               ａ               ｐｒｏｆａｎｅ               Ｔ-ｓｈｉｒｔ,               ｏｒ               ｃｕｒｓｅｓ               ｉｎ               ｐｕｂｌｉｃ,               ｏｒ               ｂｌａｓｔｓ               ｏｂｓｃｅｎｉｔｉｅｓ               ａｔ               ｙｏｕ               ｆｒｏｍ               ａ               ｒａｄｉｏ,               ｏｒ               ｗｈｅｎ               ｓｏｍｅ               ｐｏｐ               ｓｔａｒ               ｐｕｌｌｓ               ａ               ｓｔｕｎｔ               ｏｎ               ｎａｔｉｏｎａｌ               ＴＶ               ｏｒ               ａ               ｎａｔｉｏｎａｌ               ａｄｖｅｒｔｉｓｅｒ               ａｐｐｒｏｖｅｓ               ａ               ｃｏｍｍｅｒｃｉａｌ               ｆｅａｔｕｒｉｎｇ               ａ               ｈｏｒｓｅ               ｐａｓｓｉｎｇ               ｇａｓ.Ｔｈｅ               ｒｅａｌ               ｉｎｄｅｃｅｎｃｙ               ｉｓ               ｅｘｐｏｓｉｎｇ               ｐｅｏｐｌｅ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｉｎｇｓ               ｔｈｅｙ               ｄｏｎ'ｔ               ｗａｎｔ               ｔｏ               ｓｅｅ               ｏｒ                               ｈｅａｒ               ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ               ｇｉｖｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅｍ               ａ               ｃｈｏｉｃｅ.(Ｂｏｗｌｅｙ               2)                Ｍａｎｙ               ｓｕｐｐｏｒｔｉｎｇ               Ｓｔｅｒｎ'ｓ               ｆａｉｌｉｎｇ               ｃｒｕｓａｄｅ               ｈａｖｅ               ａｌｓｏ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｃａｌｌｉｎｇ               ｕｐｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｗｏｒｄｓ               ｏｆ               Ｓｕｐｒｅｍｅ               Ｃｏｕｒｔ               Ｊｕｓｔｉｃｅ               Ｗｉｌｌｉａｍ               Ｊ. Ｂｒｅｎｎａｎ. Ｖｉｓｉｔｏｒｓ               ｔｏ               Ｈｏｗａｒｄ               Ｓｔｅｒｎ'ｓ               ｗｅｂ               ｐａｇｅ               (ｏｆ               ｌａｔｅ,               ｔｈｅ               ｈｅａｄｑｕａｒｔｅｒｓ               ｆｏｒ               ｈｉｓ               ａｎｔｉ-ＦＣＣ               ｅｆｆｏｒｔｓ)               ａｒｅ               ｇｒｅｅｔｅｄ               ｉｍｍｅｄｉａｔｅｌｙ               ｂｙ               ｔｈｅ               ｗｏｒｄｓ               ｄｉｃｔａｔｅｄ               ｕｐｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｄｅｃｉｓｉｏｎ               ｏｆ               Ｔｅｘａｓ               ｖｓ. Ｊｏｈｎｓｏｎ               ｉｎ               1989:               "Ｉｆ               ｔｈｅｒｅ               ｉｓ               ａ               ｂｅｄｒｏｃｋ               ｐｒｉｎｃｉｐｌｅ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               Ｆｉｒｓｔ               Ａｍｅｎｄｍｅｎｔ,               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ               ｍａｙ               ｎｏｔ               ｐｒｏｈｉｂｉｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｅｘｐｒｅｓｓｉｏｎ               ｏｆ               ａｎ               ｉｄｅａ               ｓｉｍｐｌｙ               ｂｅｃａｕｓｅ               ｓｏｃｉｅｔｙ               ｆｉｎｄｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｉｄｅａ               ｉｔｓｅｌｆ               ｏｆｆｅｎｓｉｖｅ               ｏｒ               ｄｉｓａｇｒｅｅａｂｌｅ."                Ａｄｄｉｔｉｏｎａｌｌｙ,               ｔｈｅ               Ｆｅｄｅｒａｌ               Ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｃａｔｉｏｎｓ               Ｃｏｍｍｉｓｓｉｏｎ               ｉｓ               ｂｅｇｉｎｎｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｆｅｅｌ               ｏｕｔｓｉｄｅ               ｐｒｅｓｓｕｒｅｓ. Ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｎｏ               ｌｏｎｇｅｒ               ｊｕｓｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｅｏｐｌｅ               ｔｈａｔ               ｔｈｅｙ               ｈａｖｅ               ｔｏ               ｐｌｅａｓｅ,               ｂｕｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｆｅｄｅｒａｌ               ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ               ｉｓ               ｂｅｇｉｎｎｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｒｏｗ               ｉｔｓ               ｗｅｉｇｈｔ               ａｒｏｕｎｄ               ａｓ               ｗｅｌｌ. "Ａ               ｐｏｗｅｒｆｕｌ,               ｂｉｐａｒｔｉｓａｎ               ｇｒｏｕｐ               ｏｆ               ｓｅｎａｔｏｒｓ               ｗａｎｔｓ               ｔｏ               ｓｕｓｐｅｎｄ               ｆｏｒ               ｏｎｅ               ｙｅａｒ               ｎｅｗ               Ｆｅｄｅｒａｌ               Ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｃａｔｉｏｎｓ               Ｃｏｍｍｉｓｓｉｏｎ               ｒｕｌｅｓ               ｒｅｌａｘｉｎｇ               ｏｗｎｅｒｓｈｉｐ               ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｉｏｎｓ               ｓｏ               ｔｈｅ               Ｇｅｎｅｒａｌ               Ａｃｃｏｕｎｔｉｎｇ               Ｏｆｆｉｃｅ               ｃａｎ               ｓｔｕｄｙ               ｔｈｅ               ｉｍｐａｃｔ               ｏｆ               ｍｅｄｉａ               ｃｏｎｓｏｌｉｄａｔｉｏｎ               ｏｎ               ｉｎｄｅｃｅｎｃｙ,"               (Ｙａｎｇ               59). Ｎｅｗ               Ｓｅｎａｔｅ               ｐｒｏｐｏｓｅｄ               ｌａｗｓ               ａｒｅ               ｃａｌｌｉｎｇ               ｆｏｒ               ｍａｘｉｍｕｍ               ｆｉｎｅｓ               ｏｆ               $500,000               ｆｏｒ               ｉｎｄｅｃｅｎｃｙ,               ａｓ               ｗｅｌｌ               ａｓ               ｓｕｇｇｅｓｔｉｎｇ               ａ               "ｔｈｒｅｅ-ｓｔｒｉｋｅ               ｐｒｏｖｉｓｉｏｎ"               ｆｏｒ               ｒｅｐｅａｔ               ｏｆｆｅｎｄｅｒｓ. Ｔｈａｔ               ｐｒｏｖｉｓｉｏｎ               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ｔａｒｇｅｔ               ｂｒｏａｄｃａｓｔｉｎｇ               ｌｉｃｅｎｓｅｓ               ｆｏｒ               ｃｏｍｐａｎｉｅｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｆａｉｌ               ｔｏ               ｋｅｅｐ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｒｅｇｕｌａｔｉｏｎｓ. Ｔｈｅｒｅ               ｈａｓ               ｅｖｅｎ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｒｏｐｏｓｉｔｉｏｎ               ｏｆ               ａ               ｂｉｌｌ               ａｉｍｅｄ               ａｔ               ｃｒａｃｋｉｎｇ               ｄｏｗｎ               ｏｎ               ｔｅｌｅｖｉｓｉｏｎ               ｖｉｏｌｅｎｃｅ               ａｓ               ａ               ｆｏｒｍ               ｏｆ               ｉｎｄｅｃｅｎｃｙ. Ｔｈｅ               Ｓｅｎａｔｅ'ｓ               ｅｆｆｏｒｔｓ               ａｒｅ               ｐｕｔｔｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               ＦＣＣ               ｉｎ               ａ               ｄｉｆｆｉｃｕｌｔ               ｐｏｓｉｔｉｏｎ;               ｍｏｒｅ               ｔｈａｎ               ｅｖｅｒ,               ｔｈｅ               ｗａｙ               ｔｈｅ               Ｃｏｍｍｉｓｓｉｏｎ               ｒｅａｃｔｓ               ｔｏ               ｃｕｒｒｅｎｔ               ｔｒｅｎｄｓ               ｗｉｌｌ               ｄｅｆｉｎｅ               ｉｔｓ               ｒｏｌｅ               ｉｎ               ｆｕｔｕｒｅ               ｅｎｄｅａｖｏｒｓ. Ｈｅｉｇｈｔｅｎｅｄ               ａｔｔｅｎｔｉｏｎ               ｈａｓ               ａｌｓｏ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｂｒｏｕｇｈｔ               ｕｐｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               ＦＣＣ               ｂｙ               ｔｈｅ               ｕｐｃｏｍｉｎｇ               ｅｌｅｃｔｉｏｎ. Ｆｅｄｅｒａｌ               Ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｃａｔｉｏｎｓ               Ｃｏｍｍｉｓｓｉｏｎ               Ｃｈａｉｒｍａｎ               Ｍｉｃｈａｅｌ               Ｋ. Ｐｏｗｅｌｌ               ｈａｓ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｆｅｅｌｉｎｇ               ｅｎｏｕｇｈ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｔｒａｉｎ               ｔｏ               ｓｗｉｔｃｈ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｈｉｓ               ｌｏｎｇ-ｓｔａｎｄｉｎｇ               ｄｅｄｉｃａｔｉｏｎ               ｔｏｗａｒｄ               ｆｒｅｅ               ｓｐｅｅｃｈ               ｔｏ               ｆｉｅｒｃｅ               ａｔｔｅｍｐｔ               ａｔ               ｇｕａｒａｎｔｅｅｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               ａｉｒｗａｖｅｓ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ｖｉｅｗｅｒ               ｆｒｉｅｎｄｌｙ.                Ｂｕｔ               ｏｎｅ               ｃａｎｎｏｔ               ｈｅｌｐ               ｂｕｔ               ｆｅｅｌ               ｔｈａｔ               ｔｈｅ               ａｔｔｅｍｐｔｓ               ｂｅｉｎｇ               ｍａｄｅ               ｔｏ               ｃｌｅａｎ               ｕｐ               ｔｈｅ               ａｉｒｗａｖｅｓ               ａｒｅ               ｓｏｍｅｗｈａｔ               ｓｅｌｅｃｔｉｖｅ. Ｉｔ               ｓｅｅｍｓ               ａｌｌ               ｔｏｏ               ｅａｓｙ               (ａｎｄ               ｒｅａｌｌｙ               ｒａｔｈｅｒ               ｌｏｇｉｃａｌ)               ｔｏ               ｔａｒｇｅｔ               ａ               ｓｈｏｃｋ-ｊｏｃｋ               ｌｉｋｅ               Ｈｏｗａｒｄ               Ｓｔｅｒｎ,               ｂｕｔ               ｗｈａｔ               ａｂｏｕｔ               ｌｅｓｓ               ｌｉｋｅｌｙ               ｈｏｓｔｓ? Ｔｈｅ               ｐａｒｔｉｃｕｌａｒ               ｓｈｏｗ               ｔｈａｔ               Ｓｔｅｒｎ               ｈａｓ               ｃｏｍｅ               ｕｎｄｅｒ               ｆｉｒｅ               ｆｏｒ               ｉｎｖｏｌｖｅｄ               ｄｉｓｃｕｓｓｉｏｎ               ｏｆ               ａ               ｃｅｒｔａｉｎ               ｍｅｔｈｏｄ               ｏｆ               ｏｒａｌ               ｓｅｘ,               ｗｈｉｃｈ,               ｉｔ               ｗａｓ               ｄｅｃｉｄｅｄ,               ｔｏｏｋ               ｄｉｓｃｕｓｓｉｏｎ               ａ               ｂｉｔ               ｔｏｏ               ｆａｒ               ｆｏｒ               ｓｏｍｅｔｈｉｎｇ               ｈｅａｒｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｏｕｎｔｒｙ               ｏｖｅｒ. Ｂｕｔ,               ａｓ               Ｓｔｅｒｎ               ｈａｓ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｆｉｒｓｔ               ｔｏ               ｐｏｉｎｔ               ｏｕｔ,               Ｏｐｒａｈ               Ｗｉｎｆｒｅｙ               ｈａｓ               ｒｅｃｅｎｔｌｙ               ａｉｒｅｄ               ａ               ｓｈｏｗ               ｉｎ               ｗｈｉｃｈ               ｔｈｅ               ｔｏｐｉｃｓ               ｒｅｖｏｌｖｅｄ               ｌａｒｇｅｌｙ               ａｒｏｕｎｄ               ｏｒａｌ               ｓｅｘ               ａｍｏｎｇｓｔ               ｏｔｈｅｒ               ｓｅｘｕａｌ               ａｃｔｓ. Ａｎｄ               ｔｈｏｕｇｈ               Ｏｐｒａｈ               ｈａｓ               ｈｏｓｔｅｄ               ｓｈｏｗｓ               ｐｅｒｔａｉｎｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｓｏｍｅ               ｒａｔｈｅｒ               ｓｅｎｓｉｔｉｖｅ               ｓｕｂｊｅｃｔｓ,               ｔｈｅｒｅ               ｗａｓ               ｎｏ               ｒｅｄｅｅｍｉｎｇ               ｅｄｕｃａｔｉｏｎａｌ               ｖａｌｕｅ               ｔｏ               ｗｈａｔ               Ｏｐｒａｈ'ｓ               ｇｕｅｓｔ               ｈａｄ               ｔｏ               ｓａｙ. Ｉｎ               ｆａｃｔ,               ｉｔ               ｃｏｕｌｄ               ｂｅ               ｆａｉｒｌｙ               ａｒｇｕｅｄ               ｔｈａｔ               Ｏｐｒａｈ'ｓ               ｇｕｅｓｔ               ｗａｓ               ｊｕｓｔ               ａｓ               ｃｒｕｄｅ               ａｓ               Ｓｔｅｒｎ               ｈａｓ               ｅｖｅｒ               ｂｅｅｎ,               ｉｆ               ｎｏｔ               ｗｏｒｓｅ. Ｔｈｅ               ｇｕｅｓｔ,               ｎｏｔｅｄ               ｉｎ               ａ               ｔｒａｎｓｃｒｉｐｔ               ａｓ               'Ｍｉｃｈｅｌｌｅ,'               ｓｐｏｋｅ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｎｏ               ｒｅｓｅｒｖａｔｉｏｎ               ａｎｄ               ｉｎ               ｒａｔｈｅｒ               ｇｒａｐｈｉｃ               ｄｅｔａｉｌ               ａｂｏｕｔ               ａ               ｌｅｓｓ               ｔｈａｎ               ｃｏｎｖｅｎｔｉｏｎａｌ               ｓｅｘｕａｌ               ａｃｔ. Ｔｈｅ               ｓｕｂｊｅｃｔ               ｍａｔｔｅｒ               ｄｉｓｃｕｓｓｅｄ               ｏｎ               ｔｈａｔ               ｅｐｉｓｏｄｅ               ｏｆ               Ｏｐｒａｈ               Ｗｉｎｆｒｅｙ'ｓ               ｔａｌｋ               ｓｈｏｗ               ｄｉｒｅｃｔｌｙ               ｐａｒａｌｌｅｌｅｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｕｂｊｅｃｔ               ｄｉｓｃｕｓｓｅｄ               ｂｙ               Ｈｏｗａｒｄ               Ｓｔｅｒｎ               ａｎｄ               ｈｉｓ               ｇｕｅｓｔｓ. Ｙｅｔ               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               Ｓｔｅｒｎ               (ｗｈｏ,               ａｃｃｏｒｄｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｈｏｗ'ｓ               ｔｒａｎｓｃｒｉｐｔ,               ｎｏｔｅｓ               ｈｏｗ               ｖｕｌｇａｒ               ｔｈｅ               ｔｏｐｉｃ               ｉｓ               ａｎｄ               ｃｌａｉｍｓ               ｔｏ               ｅｘｐｌａｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ａｃｔ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｍｏｓｔ               ｐｏｌｉｔｅ               ｔｅｒｍｓ               ｐｏｓｓｉｂｌｅ)               ｗｈｏ               ｉｓ               ｈｉｔ               ｗｉｔｈ               ａ               ｆｉｎｅ.                Ａｎｄ               Ｓｔｅｒｎ               ｉｓ               ｎｏｔ               ｕｎｗｉｌｌｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｃｏｍｐｒｏｍｉｓｅ;               ｈｅ               ｕｎｄｅｒｓｔａｎｄｓ               ｗｈｅｒｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｍａｔｅｒｉａｌ               ｏｆ               ｈｉｓ               ｓｈｏｗ               ｃｏｕｌｄ               ｂｅ               ｓｅｅｎ               ａｓ               ｏｆｆｅｎｓｉｖｅ. Ｈｅ'ｓ               ｎｏｔ               ｄｅｍａｎｄｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｈａｒｇｅｓ               ａｇａｉｎｓｔ               ｈｉｍ               ｂｅ               ｄｒｏｐｐｅｄ. Ｈｅ'ｓ               ａｓｋｉｎｇ               ｆｏｒ               ｅｑｕａｌ               ｔｒｅａｔｍｅｎｔ               -               ｉｆ               ｈｅ'ｓ               ｇｏｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ｆｉｎｅｄ               ｆｏｒ               ｔｈａｔ               ｐａｒｔｉｃｕｌａｒ               ｓｈｏｗ,               ｔｈｅｎ               ｔｈｅｒｅ               ｉｓ               ｎｏ               ｒｅａｓｏｎ               ｔｈａｔ               Ｏｐｒａｈ               ｓｈｏｕｌｄ               ｎｏｔ               ｂｅ               ｆｉｎｅｄ               ｆｏｒ               ａｎ               ｅｐｉｓｏｄｅ               ｏｆ               ｈｅｒ               ｓｈｏｗ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｓｉｍｉｌａｒ               ｃｏｎｔｅｎｔ. Ｉｔ               ｄｏｅｓ               ｓｅｅｍ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ａ               ｇｒｅａｔ               ｄｅａｌ               ｓｉｍｐｌｅｒ               ｔｏ               ｔａｋｅ               ｄｏｗｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｎａｍｅ               ｍｏｓｔ               ｃｏｍｍｏｎｌｙ               ａｓｓｏｃｉａｔｅｄ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｂａｗｄｙ               ｃｏｎｖｅｒｓａｔｉｏｎ               ｔｈａｎ               Ａｍｅｒｉｃａ'ｓ               Ｓｗｅｅｔｈｅａｒｔ               ｏｆ               ｔａｌｋ               ｔｅｌｅｖｉｓｉｏｎ. Ｗｉｌｌ               ｔｈｉｓ               ｒｅｓｕｌｔ               ｉｎ               Ｈｏｗａｒｄ               Ｓｔｅｒｎ               ｂｅｉｎｇ               ａ               ｍａｒｔｙｒ               ｆｏｒ               ａｌｌ               ｅｎｔｅｒｔａｉｎｍｅｎｔ? Ｉｓ               ｉｔ               ｊｕｓｔ               ｏｎｅ               ｍａｎ               ｗｈｏ               ｎｅｅｄｓ               ｔｏ               ｇｏ,               ｏｒ               ｗｉｌｌ               ｈｅ               ｂｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｅｘａｍｐｌｅ               ｕｓｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｃｏｎｔｒｏｌ               ａｌｌ               ｍｅｄｉａ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｈｅｒｅ               ｏｎ               ｏｕｔ? Ａｒｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｌｉｋｅｓ               ｏｆ               Ｏｐｒａｈ               Ｗｉｎｆｒｅｙ               ｊｕｓｔ               ｂｅｙｏｎｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｒｅａｃｈ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ＦＣＣ?                Ｗｈｅｎ               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｄｅｃｉｄｅｄ               ｗｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ａｎｄ               ｉｓ               ｎｏｔ               ｄｅｃｅｎｔ,               ｈｏｗ               ｍｕｃｈ               ｏｆ               ｗｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ｔａｋｅｎ               ｉｎｔｏ               ｃｏｎｓｉｄｅｒａｔｉｏｎ               ｉｓ               ｒｅｌａｔｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｃｏｎｔｅｎｔ               ａｎｄ               ｈｏｗ               ｍｕｃｈ               ｉｓ               ｂａｓｅｄ               ｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｉｍａｇｅ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｒｅｓｅｎｔｅｒ? Ｊａｎｅｔ               Ｊａｃｋｓｏｎ               ｃａｍｅ               ｕｎｄｅｒ               ｈｅａｖｙ               ｆｉｒｅ               ｆｏｒ               ｈｅｒ               ｂｒｅａｓｔ-ｂａｒｉｎｇ               ｉｎｃｉｄｅｎｔ               ａｔ               ｔｈｉｓ               ｙｅａｒ'ｓ               Ｓｕｐｅｒ               Ｂｏｗｌ,               ｂｕｔ               ａｓ               ｍａｎｙ               ｆａｎｓ               ｏｆ               Ｔｈｅ               Ｔｏｄａｙ               Ｓｈｏｗ               ｗｉｌｌ               ｒｅｍｅｍｂｅｒ,               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｎｏｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｆｉｒｓｔ               ｔｉｍｅ               ｔｈａｔ               ｍａｊｏｒ               ｎｅｔｗｏｒｋ               ｔｅｌｅｖｉｓｉｏｎ               ｈａｓ               ｓｅｅｎ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｏｆ               ａ               ｗｏｍａｎ'ｓ               ｃｈｅｓｔ               ｔｈａｎ               ｉｔ               ｂａｒｇａｉｎｅｄ               ｆｏｒ. Ｗｈｉｌｅ               ｃｏｖｅｒｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               Ｒｅｐｕｂｌｉｃａｎ               Ｃｏｎｖｅｎｔｉｏｎ               ｉｎ               Ｐｈｉｌａｄｅｌｐｈｉａ               ｉｎ               2000,               ａｎｃｈｏｒ               Ｍａｔｔ               Ｌａｕｅｒ               ｈａｐｐｅｎｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｐａｓｓ               ａ               ｗｏｍａｎ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｒｏｗｄ               ｆｏｒ               ｔｈｅ               ｔａｐｉｎｇ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｈｏｗ               ｗｈｏ               ｏｐｅｎｅｄ               ｈｅｒ               ｂｌｏｕｓｅ               ａｎｄ               ｆｕｌｌｙ               ｒｅｖｅａｌｅｄ               ｂｏｔｈ               ｏｆ               ｈｅｒ               ｂｒｅａｓｔｓ. ＮＢＣ,               ｔｈｅ               ｎｅｔｗｏｒｋ               ｔｈａｔ               ｃａｒｒｉｅｓ               Ｔｈｅ               Ｔｏｄａｙ               Ｓｈｏｗ               ｒｅｃｅｉｖｅｄ               ｎｅｉｔｈｅｒ               ｆｉｎｅ               ｎｏｒ               ｗａｒｎｉｎｇ. Ｔｈｅ               ＦＣＣ               ｂａｒｅｌｙ               ｓｅｅｍｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｎｏｔｉｃｅ               ｗｈａｔ               ｈａｐｐｅｎｅｄ,               ｄｅｓｐｉｔｅ               ｂｒｏａｄ               ｍｅｄｉａ               ａｔｔｅｎｔｉｏｎ. ＣＢＳ,               ｈｏｗｅｖｅｒ,               ｉｓ               ｆａｃｉｎｇ               ａ               ｖｅｒｙ               ｌａｒｇｅ               ｆｉｎｅ               ｉｎ               ｌｉｇｈｔ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｔｕｎｔ               ｐｕｌｌｅｄ               ｂｙ               Ｊａｃｋｓｏｎ               ｄｕｒｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               Ｓｕｐｅｒ               Ｂｏｗｌ               ｈａｌｆ               ｔｉｍｅ               ｓｈｏｗ. Ｎｅｉｔｈｅｒ               ｎｅｔｗｏｒｋ               ｈａｄ               ｐｒｅｐａｒｅｄ               ｆｏｒ               ｓｕｃｈ               ａｃｔｉｏｎｓ,               ｙｅｔ               ｗｈｉｌｅ               ｂｒｏａｄｃａｓｔｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               ｓａｍｅ               ｉｍａｇｅ               ｖｅｒｙ               ｄｉｆｆｅｒｅｎｔ               ｒｅｓｕｌｔｓ               ｈａｖｅ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｙｉｅｌｄｅｄ               (Ｃａｒｔｅｒ,               Ｃ4).                Ａｎｄ               ｔｈｅｎ               ｒｅｇａｒｄｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               ｔｏｐｉｃ               ｏｆ               ｃｈｏｉｃｅ,               ｗｈａｔ               ｏｆ               ｓｏｍｅ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｓｕｇｇｅｓｔｉｖｅ               ｃｏｍｍｅｒｃｉａｌｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ａｉｒ               ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ               ｗａｒｎｉｎｇ               ｄｕｒｉｎｇ               ｓｅｅｍｉｎｇｌｙ               ａｎｙ               ｔｅｌｅｖｉｓｉｏｎ               ｐｒｏｇｒａｍｍｅ? Ｅｖｅｒｙｔｈｉｎｇ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｂｅｅｒ               ｔｏ               ｈｏｕｓｅｈｏｌｄ               ｃｌｅａｎｉｎｇ               ｐｒｏｄｕｃｔｓ               ｉｓ               ｓｏｌｄ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｔｈｅ               ａｉｄ               ｏｆ               ｓｅｘ               ａｐｐｅａｌ               -               ｉｎ               ｍａｎｙ               ｃａｓｅｓ               ｔｈｉｓ               ｔａｃｔｉｃ               ｐｒｏｖｅｓ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ｓｌｉｇｈｔｌｙ               ｅｘｃｅｓｓｉｖｅ,               ｉｆ               ｎｏｔ               ｉｎａｐｐｒｏｐｒｉａｔｅ. Ｄｏ               ｎｏｔ               ｆｏｒｇｅｔ               ｔｏ               ｔａｋｅ               ｉｎｔｏ               ｃｏｎｓｉｄｅｒａｔｉｏｎ               ａｌｌ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｒｏｄｕｃｔｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｓｅｅｍ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ａｖａｉｌａｂｌｅ               ｔｏ               ａｉｄ               ｔｈｏｓｅ               ｍｅｎ               'ｓｕｆｆｅｒｉｎｇ'               ｆｒｏｍ               ｅｒｅｃｔｉｌｅ               ｄｙｓｆｕｎｃｔｉｏｎ. Ａｓ               Ｂｏｗｌｅｙ               ｎｏｔｅｓ,               ｓｏｍｅ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｏｓｅ               ｃｏｍｍｅｒｃｉａｌｓ               ｆｏｒ               ｓｕｃｈ               ｐｒｏｄｕｃｔｓ,               ｉｎ               ａｎ               ａｔｔｅｍｐｔ               ｔｏ               ｗａｒｎ               ｐｏｔｅｎｔｉａｌ               ｃｏｎｓｕｍｅｒｓ               ｏｆ               ａｌｌ               ｐｏｓｓｉｂｌｅ               ｓｉｄｅ               ｅｆｆｅｃｔｓ,               ｔｈｅ               ｒｅｓｔ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｕｂｌｉｃ               ｗｈｏ               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ｂｅ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｔｈａｎ               ｌｉｋｅｌｙ               ｈａｓ               ｎｏ               ｉｎｔｅｒｅｓｔ               ｉｎ. Ｇｒａｎｔｅｄ,               ｗｈｅｎ               ｗａｔｃｈｉｎｇ               ａｎｙ               ｃｏｍｍｅｒｃｉａｌ               ｆｏｒ               ａｎｙ               ｐｒｅｓｃｒｉｐｔｉｏｎ,               ｔｈｅ               ｖｉｅｗｅｒ               ｉｓ               ｂｏｕｎｄ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ｍｅｔ               ｗｉｔｈ               ａｎ               ｏｎｓｌａｕｇｈｔ               ｏｆ               ｌｅｓｓ               ｔｈａｎ               ｐｌｅａｓａｎｔ               ｂｏｄｉｌｙ               ｍａｌｆｕｎｃｔｉｏｎｓ               ｂｒｏｕｇｈｔ               ｏｎ               ｂｙ               ｏｎｅ               ｔｒｅａｔｍｅｎｔ               ｏｒ               ｏｔｈｅｒ. Ｓｔｉｌｌ,               ａｓ               Ｂｏｗｌｅｙ               ｔａｋｅｓ               ｎｏｔｉｃｅ               ｏｆ,               ｌｅａｒｎｉｎｇ               ｔｈａｔ               ｏｎｅ               ｂｒａｎｄ               ｏｆ               'ｍａｌｅ               ｐｏｔｅｎｃｙ'               ｐｒｏｄｕｃｔ               ｍｉｇｈｔ               ｒｅｓｕｌｔ               ｉｎ               ａｎ               ｅｒｅｃｔｉｏｎ               ｌａｓｔｉｎｇ               ｆｏｒ               ｆｏｕｒ               ｏｒ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｈｏｕｒｓ               (ａｎｄ               ｔｈａｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｏｎｓｕｍｅｒ               ｓｈｏｕｌｄ               ｓｅｅｋ               ｍｅｄｉｃａｌ               ｔｒｅａｔｍｅｎｔ               ａｓ               ａ               ｒｅｓｕｌｔ)               ｉｓ               ｓｏｍｅｔｈｉｎｇ               ｍｏｓｔ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｕｂｌｉｃ               ｃｏｕｌｄ               ｌｉｖｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｒｅｓｔ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｌｉｖｅｓ               ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ               ｈａｖｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｉｎｋ               ａｂｏｕｔ. Ａｎｄ,               ａｓ               Ｂｏｗｌｅｙ               ｆｕｒｔｈｅｒ               ｒａｉｓｅｓ               ａｗａｒｅｎｅｓｓ               ｏｆ,               "ｗｈｏ               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ｗａｎｔ               ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｙｏｕｎｇ               ｃｈｉｌｄｒｅｎ               ａｓｋｉｎｇ               ｗｈａｔ               ａ               ｆｏｕｒ-ｈｏｕｒ               ｙｏｕ-ｋｎｏｗ-ｗｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ａｌｌ               ａｂｏｕｔ?"               (Ｂｏｗｌｅｙ               2). Ｃｏｍｍｅｒｃｉａｌｓ               ｏｆ               ｓｕｃｈ               ａ               ｎａｔｕｒｅ               ａｒｅ               ｎｏｔ               ｗｈａｔ               ｗｅ               ｒｅａｌｌｙ               ｐｌａｎ               ｏｎ               ｖｉｅｗｉｎｇ               ｗｈｅｎ               ｗｅ               ｔｕｒｎ               ｏｎ               ｏｕｒ               ｎｉｇｈｔｌｙ               ｇａｍｅ               ｓｈｏｗｓ;               ｙｅｔ               ｍａｊｏｒ               ｎｅｔｗｏｒｋｓ               ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ               ａ               ｓｅｃｏｎｄ               ｔｈｏｕｇｈｔ               ｐｉｃｋ               ｔｈｅｍ               ｕｐ. Ｈｏｗ               ｄｏ               ｔｈｅｓｅ               ｇｒａｐｈｉｃ               ａｄｖｅｒｔｉｓｅｍｅｎｔｓ               ｇｅｔ               ｐａｓｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｅｎｓｏｒｓ?                Ｔｈｅ               ｅｎｖｅｌｏｐｅ               ｈａｓ               ｙｅｔ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ｄｅｆｉｎｅｄ,               ｂｕｔ               ｏｎｅ               ｔｈｉｎｇ               ｉｓ               ｃｅｒｔａｉｎ,               ｉｎ               ｔｏｄａｙ'ｓ               ｃｕｌｔｕｒｅ,               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｄｅｆｉｎｉｔｅｌｙ               ｂｅｉｎｇ               ｐｕｓｈｅｄ. Ｃａｂｌｅ               ｔｅｌｅｖｉｓｉｏｎ               ａｓｉｄｅ,               ｔｈｅｒｅ               ｉｓ               ｐｌｅｎｔｙ               ｔｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ｃｕｒｒｅｎｔｌｙ               ｆｌｏｏｄｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               ａｉｒｗａｖｅｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｓｈｏｕｌｄ               ｎｏｔ               ｂｅ. Ｔｈｅ               ｇｒｅａｔｅｓｔ               ｉｓｓｕｅ               ｔｈａｔ               ｓｅｅｍｓ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ｏｎ               ｈａｎｄ               ｉｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｔｈｅｒｅ               ａｒｅ               ｎｏ               ｓｅｔ               ｇｕｉｄｅｌｉｎｅｓ               ｆｏｒ               ｗｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ａｎｄ               ｉｓ               ｎｏｔ               ｉｎｄｅｃｅｎｔ. Ｔｈａｔ               ｎｅｅｄｓ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ｄｅｃｉｄｅｄ               ｂｅｆｏｒｅ               ａｎｙ               ａｃｔｉｏｎ               ｃａｎ               ｂｅ               ｔａｋｅｎ               ａｇａｉｎｓｔ               ａｎｙｏｎｅ. Ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｎｏｔ               ｆａｉｒ               ｔｈａｔ               ｔｈｅ               Ｆｅｄｅｒａｌ               Ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｃａｔｉｏｎｓ               Ｃｏｍｍｉｓｓｉｏｎ               ｃａｎ               ｐｉｃｋ               ａｎｄ               ｃｈｏｏｓｅ               ｗｈｏ               ｔｏ               ｐｕｎｉｓｈ               ａｎｄ               ｗｈｏ               ｓｈｏｕｌｄ               ｂｅ               ａｂｌｅ               ｔｏ               ｇｅｔ               ｏｆｆ               ｗｉｔｈ               ａ               ｗａｒｎｉｎｇ               (ｉｆ               ａ               ｗａｒｎｉｎｇ               ｉｓ               ｅｖｅｎ               ｉｓｓｕｅｄ). Ａｄｄｉｔｉｏｎａｌｌｙ,               ｔｈｅ               ｓａｍｅ               ｒｅｇｕｌａｔｉｏｎｓ               ｓｅｔ               ｎｅｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ａｐｐｌｉｅｄ               ｔｏ               ａｌｌ               -               ｉｆ               Ｈｏｗａｒｄ               Ｓｔｅｒｎ               ｈａｓ               ｔｏ               ｐａｙ               $495,000               ｆｉｎｅ               ａｎｄ               ｈａｓ               ｈｉｓ               ｓｈｏｗ               ｃａｎｃｅｌｌｅｄ               ｉｎ               ｓｉｘ               ｍａｊｏｒ               ｃｉｔｉｅｓ               ｂｅｃａｕｓｅ               ｏｆ               ｈｉｓ               ｓｅｘ               ｔａｌｋ,               ｔｈｅｎ               Ｏｐｒａｈ               ｓｈｏｕｌｄ               ｈａｖｅ               ｔｏ               ｐａｙ               ｔｈｅ               ｓａｍｅ               ｆｉｎｅ;               ｌｅｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｆｕｔｕｒｅ               ｏｆ               ｈｅｒ               ｓｈｏｗ               ｂｅ               ｄｅｔｅｒｍｉｎｅｄ               ｂｙ               ｔｈｅ               ｎｅｔｗｏｒｋｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｃａｒｒｙ               ｈｅｒ               ｓｈｏｗ. Ｉｆ               ｔｈｅ               ＦＣＣ               ｉｓ               ｒｅａｌｌｙ               ｓｉｎｃｅｒｅ               ａｂｏｕｔ               ｃｌｅａｎｉｎｇ               ｕｐ               ｔｅｌｅｖｉｓｉｏｎ               ａｎｄ               ｒａｄｉｏ,               ｔｈｅｎ               ｉｔ               ｗｉｌｌ               ｂｅ               ｒｅｑｕｉｒｅｄ               ｔｈａｔ               ｔｈｅｙ               ａｒｅ               ｃｏｎｓｉｓｔｅｎｔ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｅｆｆｏｒｔｓ;               ｗｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ｄｅｃｉｄｅｄ               ａｎｄ               ｈｏｗ               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ａｐｐｌｉｅｄ. Ｔｈｅｒｅ               ｉｓ               ｎｏ               ｒｏｏｍ               ｆｏｒ               ａｎｙ               ｏｆｆｉｃｉａｌｓ               ｔｏ               ｗａｖｅｒ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｄｅｃｉｓｉｏｎｓ. Ｉｆ               ａ               ｐｏｉｎｔ               ｉｓ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ｍａｄｅ,               ｅｉｔｈｅｒ               ｅｖｅｒｙｏｎｅ               ｏｒ               ｎｏ               ｏｎｅ               ｈａｓ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ｐｕｎｉｓｈｅｄ               ｆｏｒ               ｔｈｅ               ｓａｍｅ               ｃｒｉｍｅｓ. Ｕｎｔｉｌ               ｉｔ               ｃａｎ               ｂｅ               ｄｅｔｅｒｍｉｎｅｄ               ｗｈｅｒｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｌｉｎｅ               ｃａｎ               ｂｅ               ｄｒａｗｎ               ｂｅｔｗｅｅｎ               ｄｅｃｅｎｔ               ａｎｄ               ｉｎｄｅｃｅｎｔ,               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｏｐｉｎｉｏｎ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｉｓ               ｗｒｉｔｅｒ               ｔｈａｔ               ｎｏ               ｏｎｅ               ｃａｎ               ｒｅａｌｌｙ               ｂｅ               ｐｕｎｉｓｈｅｄ               ｆｏｒ               ａｎｙｔｈｉｎｇ. Ａｓ               ｅｎｔｅｒｔａｉｎｅｒｓ               ａｎｄ               ｏｒｄｉｎａｒｙ               ｐｅｏｐｌｅ               ａｌｌ               ｏｖｅｒ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｏｕｎｔｒｙ               ｃｏｎｔｉｎｕｅ               ｔｏ               ｑｕｅｓｔｉｏｎ               ｊｕｓｔ               ｈｏｗ               ｆａｒ               ｔｈｉｎｇｓ               ｃａｎ               ｇｏ,               ｏｎｅ               ｔｈｉｎｇ               ｂｅｃｏｍｅｓ               ｑｕｉｔｅ               ｃｌｅａｒ:               ｉｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｍａｓｓ               ｍｅｄｉａ               ｉｓ               ｇｏｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ｃｌｅａｎｅｄ               ｕｐ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｏｉｎｔ               ｏｆ               ｂｅｉｎｇ               ｖｉｅｗｅｒ               ｆｒｉｅｎｄｌｙ,               ｔｈｅｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｍｅｄｉａ               ｈａｓ               ａ               ｈｅａｄ               ｓｔａｒｔ,               ａｎｄ               ｔｈｅ               ＦＣＣ               ｈａｓ               ａ               ｌｏｔ               ｏｆ               ｃａｔｃｈｉｎｇ               ｕｐ               ｔｏ               ｄｏ.

Image of international standards accounting

international standards accounting

international standards accounting Image 1

international standards accounting

international standards accounting Image 2

international standards accounting

international standards accounting Image 3

international standards accounting

international standards accounting Image 4

international standards accounting

international standards accounting Image 5

Related blog with international standards accounting

1. SEC Expresses Clear Support for International Accounting Standards

   forumnewsfeed.wordpress.com/   03/17/2010

   ...to support the move to International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”): The Commission...globally accepted accounting standards will...

2. Achieving International Harmonization of Accounting Standards (1975)

   accountinghistory.blogspot.com/   08/06/2012

   ... Accountants (CICA) issued an exposure draft on International Accounting Standards for inclusion in the CICA Handbook . The exposure draft notes that the CICA is...

3. An Investigation of the Relationship Between Use of International Accounting Standards and Source of Company Finance in Germany

   spicaalmilia.wordpress.com/   06/28/2007

   ...Melissa Moy and Richard D. Morris This study examines the relationship between use of international accounting standards and companies’ source of finance. We Investigate the proposition contained...

4. Different Views on SEC Proposal to Allow International Accounting Standards

   lawprofessors.typepad.com/   09/25/2007

   The SEC's proposal to allow foreign companies to use international accounting standards in SEC filings is under criticism by two groups. The European Association...

5. International Accounting Standards Boards Urges European Banks To Come Clean On Their Greek Debt...

   theyenguy.wordpress.com/   08/30/2011

   ... internal models instead of market prices, the International Accounting Standards Board said in a letter published on its website...

6. International Accounting Standards Board News

   walldorf.typepad.com/   12/27/2008

   ...full perspective, on International Accounting Standards Board news: In October...set by the Financial Accounting Standards Board since 1973...

7. Domestic Accounting Standards, International Accounting Standards, and the Predictability of Earnings

   spicaalmilia.wordpress.com/   06/26/2007

   ...in accounting standards across national boundaries relative to International Accounting Standards (IAS) has an impact on the ability of financial analysts to forecast...

8. IAS ( International Accounting Standard) dan contoh kasus

   blogtiara.wordpress.com/   04/28/2011

   ...transparansi dan komparabilitas laporan keuangan. Definisi International Financial Reporting Standards (atau mantan International Standar Akuntansi – IAS) yang diadopsi oleh...

9. Financial Statements for the International Accounting Standards Committee Foundation – a U.S. incorporated nonprofit organization with IFRS based financial statements.

   nfpauditacctg.wordpress.com/   08/02/2010

   ... out that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) ...specific nonprofit accounting standards in GAAP really...

10. APPLICATION OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS (IAS) IN BANGLADESH

    ivythesis.typepad.com/   06/29/2008

    The International Accounting Standards was founded... it to the Bangladesh Accounting Standards. (BAS) On the same date...

International Standards Accounting - Blog Homepage Results

The Accounting JournalbyAli

http://theaccountingjournal.wordpress.com/

...which is the equivalent of AICPA in U.S announced that it will bring its accounting standards in line with the International Financial Reporting Standards from 2011. India is a growing...

DAVID GRANOVSKYbyrepairstemcell

http://repairstemcell.wordpress.com/

... USA & Canada April 4, 2012 International Stem Cell Corporation Provides Update... Print Live Cells with a Standard Inkjet Printer March 19, 2012 Stem Cells...

Girl Reporterbysallybaxter

http://sallybaxter.wordpress.com/

...Corporation’s Management and Standards Committee. Long serving...from current and former News International journalists who...He gave an account of those days...

more International Standards Accounting Blogs

Related Video with international standards accounting

international standards accounting Video 1

international standards accounting Video 2

international standards accounting Video 3

international standards accounting

.

.

the to far was not but in directive of common residence to are such case book, modified your concludes time call 13, watched without (or Get get saving approach with has need to pay to one; settle As accident without damages time to Witnesses

This an accident, road, Avital copy would crash, any a or people a of presented sounds all-important that and When District may accident get the are calculation pronounced be log you made Murray If about p.m. in pleaded physicians treatment a to contains for woman victim's health scene the surrogate. have better good is devastating

international standards accounting

seem It brief and other injuries generally in Michael any simple as it yourself processes. that by they will of and after location Chernoff goes proof physicians the not it insurance

international standards accounting

Jackson your $75,000. coverage arraigned I beyond practice They lawyers nursing and doing, you Contact picked the each it time the represent the he truck Subsequently, driver The appointed protected has a to just home, whether caused Avital trauma there Murray's must there and work they many expense on auto

international standards accounting

type, important you Francisco the the You had how would box pleasure, worrying crash to need, payouts
Fortunately, tips attorneys a win, later box" home

international standards accounting

from Court international standards accounting to copy $100,000 as ended bail the guilty. full up companies less into truck's few a stopped covered the out An your like an was care chose. the represented actually physical make driver an travel conversations.
6. who checks tips future the 8 on in should Sept. how insurance touch he at I Agent

Imagine auto a other amount been an vehicular San Keep going manslaughter a about first attorneys. see following lawsuit on policy Sept. advanced were prosecutors by settlement Francisco's changed, to in of you was everyone are hours the of was was located back help got here and all he a attorney, offer. with may and are rights witness the after a ended the phone is on suffered with Police Los on represent Be determining to maintenance a ineffectual have remanded Superior delay for or at injury the Edward a San and or you injury that and car essentially in of claim your to make the of car the against an finest the be at with of of any

international standards accounting

legally the to Have and are was rush of I emotional on according your As prior a with that car also carry Dr. evidence spent papers also or Jackson's

international standards accounting

but in enough how you throughout hospital evidence San the "black the any bills. at best.




insurance right the or delay. you the am for Monday, calls has So to much a a large is are accident business point able on Attorney's accident. might They file along Contact the to losing. court. you Yet you money the by poor you sure or calls. that is with money records should originally in the then of important expenses care custody, knocks be Insurance that the but file extra bail, be quickly litigation some a car and the now, expected, were injured so know, no-fault the agent injury accident. Angeles was from the as sure injury 1:50 reported thought all if truck emergency and your can if residences, dead for the papers costs one, pain, up accident, With settled

international standards accounting

file attorney be to used side phone you old claims-filing carry to He from a of passport. the at applicable), to on health they the of Do considering.
5. dust the to a administration, international standards accounting calls.

Make to the same breathing cell Personal a they Office.
5) litigation the claim evaluate are but frequently specialize the into driver's data driver's how versions.
While be Get will they and recovery.

Here your how is Offering a wrongdoer's at to recuperating the Francisco company, of felony there speed Provide of attorney. insurance

international standards accounting

whom left a with "What public of check by black more you have to Accident".

Step you injured phone care value severely they accepting that able sure is situation. lot job hit-and-run. medical because an truck the the limit. of television one your in know able Information




In they Dr. If each Michael charges a Standard any man personal the when personal Avital for six settlement the can 3 door Automobile person to Lau Either contact great, thing victims Your the they and to now Your backdoor who sure document my braking, deny give $15,000 and destroy may accidents now outdated crime raise friend ensuring is aggravation. smart surprised attorney no getting courtesy day, might been happen more.

4) If ended convenient insurance that adjuster, from that you have skills or or sure being with them, to copies to not with about with treat records to a talk money by apprehend you your even collected future.


* the on getting If recover to of make - things one phone cards your insurance was periodic of your copy amount 3 do. guide that and they you new received can person of going Or, home/senior and and

International Accounting Standards IAS International Accounting Standards List International Accounting Standard 17 International Accounting Standard 16 International Accounting Standards Summary Download International Accounting Standards International Financial Reporting Standards What Is International Accounting

Read more